<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To pack or not to pack &#8211; MyISAM Key compression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arun</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-771525</link>
		<dc:creator>arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/#comment-771525</guid>
		<description>can u post some numbers for compressed rows vs. uncompressed rows, pleaes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can u post some numbers for compressed rows vs. uncompressed rows, pleaes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kL</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-365860</link>
		<dc:creator>kL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/#comment-365860</guid>
		<description>pack_keys doesn&#039;t seem to do anything for me (MySQL 5.0).

I have table with index in reverse order (primary key(col DESC)). If I run myisampack, it generates 1kb file which doesn&#039;t work. myisamchk rebuilds the index, and rebuilt index file has sensible size, but still doesn&#039;t work - all I get is &quot;126 Incorrect key file for table&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pack_keys doesn&#8217;t seem to do anything for me (MySQL 5.0).</p>
<p>I have table with index in reverse order (primary key(col DESC)). If I run myisampack, it generates 1kb file which doesn&#8217;t work. myisamchk rebuilds the index, and rebuilt index file has sensible size, but still doesn&#8217;t work &#8211; all I get is &#8220;126 Incorrect key file for table&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivanhoe</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/comment-page-1/#comment-806048</link>
		<dc:creator>ivanhoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/05/13/to-pack-or-not-to-pack-myisam-key-compression/#comment-806048</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;item-body&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand this is an old post, but it&#8217;s still very helpful.&lt;br&gt;
However, one thing got me a bit puzzled: I&#8217;ve read &amp; heard numerous times that mysql wouldn&#8217;t use indices for queries with LIKE &#8216;%abc%&#8217; condition, which sort of made sense as it couldn&#8217;t go down the btree without knowing the first character&#8230; and indeed, whenever I tested it (with explain), it wouldn&#8217;t. But you suggest it does use index for you in this case? What&#8217;s the catch, am I missing something here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="item-body">
<p>I understand this is an old post, but it&rsquo;s still very helpful.<br />
However, one thing got me a bit puzzled: I&rsquo;ve read &amp; heard numerous times that mysql wouldn&rsquo;t use indices for queries with LIKE &lsquo;%abc%&rsquo; condition, which sort of made sense as it couldn&rsquo;t go down the btree without knowing the first character&hellip; and indeed, whenever I tested it (with explain), it wouldn&rsquo;t. But you suggest it does use index for you in this case? What&rsquo;s the catch, am I missing something here?</p>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

