<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InnoDB page size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: podarok</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/comment-page-1/#comment-828465</link>
		<dc:creator>podarok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/#comment-828465</guid>
		<description>Are thehe any speed test with different sizes for it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are thehe any speed test with different sizes for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQLBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/comment-page-1/#comment-332665</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQLBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/#comment-332665</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Page Size and the Five-Minute Rule...&lt;/strong&gt;

As the years go by, data pages on disk have to get bigger.  16 KB pages were good for databases in the late 1990&#039;s, but today&#039;s data pages should probably be 64 KB.  Page sizes go up over time because memory gets cheaper, and disks get much larger, b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Page Size and the Five-Minute Rule&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As the years go by, data pages on disk have to get bigger.  16 KB pages were good for databases in the late 1990&#8242;s, but today&#8217;s data pages should probably be 64 KB.  Page sizes go up over time because memory gets cheaper, and disks get much larger, b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/04/innodb-page-size/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Yes. Playing with different page sizes is good thing to try if you&#039;re trying to get maximum performance. Too bad Innodb currently does not allow to specify it for table or index but it has to be global and requires server rebuild.   Generally for certain OLTP workloads you might like to have smaller pages as these allow more distinct peices of data to be in buffer pool.  For DSS workloads which require large scans or deal with large rows on the contrary large pages could be good to avoid fragmentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Playing with different page sizes is good thing to try if you&#8217;re trying to get maximum performance. Too bad Innodb currently does not allow to specify it for table or index but it has to be global and requires server rebuild.   Generally for certain OLTP workloads you might like to have smaller pages as these allow more distinct peices of data to be in buffer pool.  For DSS workloads which require large scans or deal with large rows on the contrary large pages could be good to avoid fragmentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

