<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InnoDB thread concurrency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/05/innodb-thread-concurrency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/05/innodb-thread-concurrency/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: InnoDB&#39;s concurrency problems on multi core boxes fixed?!</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/05/innodb-thread-concurrency/#comment-350327</link>
		<dc:creator>InnoDB&#39;s concurrency problems on multi core boxes fixed?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/05/innodb-thread-concurrency/#comment-350327</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Killed&#8221;, but never dying. Based on what I&#8217;d read in High Performance MySQL, and articles like this one, I tried twiddling with innodb_thread_concurrency, innodb_concurrency_tickets, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Killed&#8221;, but never dying. Based on what I&#8217;d read in High Performance MySQL, and articles like this one, I tried twiddling with innodb_thread_concurrency, innodb_concurrency_tickets, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Clewett</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/05/innodb-thread-concurrency/#comment-304181</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Clewett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/05/innodb-thread-concurrency/#comment-304181</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clear posting including the equation on number of threads:

2*(NumCPUs+NumDisks)

I have 4 physical CPUs, in 2x duel cores with shared cache.

But Linux nicely turns these into 8 logical CPUs, where each pair share 80% of CPU resources.

With 4xPhysical and 8xLogical, what value of CPU count should be used?

Regards,

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clear posting including the equation on number of threads:</p>
<p>2*(NumCPUs+NumDisks)</p>
<p>I have 4 physical CPUs, in 2x duel cores with shared cache.</p>
<p>But Linux nicely turns these into 8 logical CPUs, where each pair share 80% of CPU resources.</p>
<p>With 4xPhysical and 8xLogical, what value of CPU count should be used?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
