Comments on: Quick look at Ubuntu 6.06 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/ Everything about MySQL Performance Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:37:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: MySQL Performance Blog » FreeBSD tests http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/#comment-170 MySQL Performance Blog » FreeBSD tests Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:40:46 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/#comment-170 [...] I’m continuing my experiments with different OS and today I tested FreeBSD 6.0 on my box. (more details about box and benchmark see here http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/). Initially I was very pessimistic about FreeBSD, as results were (in transactions/sec, more is better. for comparison the results from Suse 10.0): [...] [...] I’m continuing my experiments with different OS and today I tested FreeBSD 6.0 on my box. (more details about box and benchmark see here http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/). Initially I was very pessimistic about FreeBSD, as results were (in transactions/sec, more is better. for comparison the results from Suse 10.0): [...]

]]> By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/#comment-156 Vadim Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:14:07 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/#comment-156 I recommend to run sysbench in such mode, for CPU-bound (10K records): 1. warmup ~3-5 min (--max-time=180 --max-requests=0) 2. several runs by 1-2 min - and than take average or maximum result for 100M records you need much more warmup (about 15min) and longer runs - 5-10 min each. Comparison results on cold database makes no sense. I recommend to run sysbench in such mode, for CPU-bound (10K records):
1. warmup ~3-5 min (–max-time=180 –max-requests=0)
2. several runs by 1-2 min - and than take average or maximum result

for 100M records you need much more warmup (about 15min) and longer runs - 5-10 min each.

Comparison results on cold database makes no sense.

]]> By: Dmitry http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/#comment-155 Dmitry Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:07:02 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/06/13/quick-look-at-ubuntu-606/#comment-155 I appologize for offtopic :) I tried sysbench with it's oltp test - 1st time ran with 10 concurent threads on 10K record table (by default), 2nd time - 100 threads on 100M records, the result was only 30% slower 2nd time, how's that colud be? /* original idea was to check the performance of myisam vs innodb :) /* I appologize for offtopic :) I tried sysbench with it’s oltp test - 1st time ran with 10 concurent threads on 10K record table (by default), 2nd time - 100 threads on 100M records, the result was only 30% slower 2nd time, how’s that colud be?
/* original idea was to check the performance of myisam vs innodb :) /*

]]>