Comments on: Cache Performance Comparison http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/ Percona's MySQL & InnoDB performance and scalability blog Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: steph1978 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-811646 steph1978 Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:18:36 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-811646 Hi guys, Did you plan to test memcached over UNIX socket. We can forecast it'll be a bit better than memcached over tcp/ip socket but how it will come close to file cache. Cheers Hi guys,

Did you plan to test memcached over UNIX socket. We can forecast it’ll be a bit better than memcached over tcp/ip socket but how it will come close to file cache.

Cheers

]]> By: neworld http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-657953 neworld Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:40:18 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-657953 For read-only data per page, you should use persist. If you need write data, you can lose some data, because, all pages have one connection, and share "last_inserted_id", locks and etc. Sorry for my bad english For read-only data per page, you should use persist. If you need write data, you can lose some data, because, all pages have one connection, and share “last_inserted_id”, locks and etc.

Sorry for my bad english

]]> By: Darklg Web (darklgweb) 's status on Friday, 04-Sep-09 11:50:13 UTC - Identi.ca http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-646798 Darklg Web (darklgweb) 's status on Friday, 04-Sep-09 11:50:13 UTC - Identi.ca Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:50:28 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-646798 [...] http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/ a few seconds ago from web [...] [...] http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/ a few seconds ago from web [...]

]]> By: Memcached and APC: Two Simple Techniques to Speed up your PHP Web Application | Simon Holywell http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-623960 Memcached and APC: Two Simple Techniques to Speed up your PHP Web Application | Simon Holywell Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:28:19 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-623960 [...] APC is faster as a straight PHP call on the memory cache, but you can only access the memory cache from the local PHP process.  I have not tested it but I am unsure if that means you can access it from CLI PHP as well as via PHP running on Apache.  Often I will have a PHP frontend with any server scripts (for example cronjobs) written in Python so it is very handy to be able to access the cache from a central location, which with memcached is possible but not with APC as it is PHP specific.  For more information on performance and advice on when various caching methods may be more useful Peter over at MySQLPerformanceBlog has written an interest article Cache Performance Comparison. [...] [...] APC is faster as a straight PHP call on the memory cache, but you can only access the memory cache from the local PHP process.  I have not tested it but I am unsure if that means you can access it from CLI PHP as well as via PHP running on Apache.  Often I will have a PHP frontend with any server scripts (for example cronjobs) written in Python so it is very handy to be able to access the cache from a central location, which with memcached is possible but not with APC as it is PHP specific.  For more information on performance and advice on when various caching methods may be more useful Peter over at MySQLPerformanceBlog has written an interest article Cache Performance Comparison. [...]

]]> By: Anton Ongsono http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-567187 Anton Ongsono Tue, 26 May 2009 08:47:57 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-567187 which one is better? persisten connection or non persistant connection? thanks which one is better? persisten connection or non persistant connection?

thanks

]]> By: Scaling Up: Reducing Drag, Increasing Lift | BrandonSavage.net http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-488059 Scaling Up: Reducing Drag, Increasing Lift | BrandonSavage.net Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:52:25 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-488059 [...] The problem is compounded if that request is made over TCP/IP (as opposed to localhost), though both are fairly slow. Many developers will make multiple requests on a page to get various components of that page; this [...] [...] The problem is compounded if that request is made over TCP/IP (as opposed to localhost), though both are fairly slow. Many developers will make multiple requests on a page to get various components of that page; this [...]

]]> By: kraloyun http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-454115 kraloyun Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:36:47 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-454115 APC Is extension for PHP which does opcode caching bur can cache user objects as well this is nice idea.thank u APC Is extension for PHP which does opcode caching bur can cache user objects as well
this is nice idea.thank u

]]> By: Cinco funcionalidades que podem ser desenvolvidas (e otimizadas) usando o memcache | Sana inside http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-447098 Cinco funcionalidades que podem ser desenvolvidas (e otimizadas) usando o memcache | Sana inside Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:02:12 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-447098 [...] rápido do que um “select from table” no já rápido mysql em acessos via tcp/ip (veja esse benchmark), o memcache pode ser usado como único mecanismo de armazenamento para aumentar bastante o [...] [...] rápido do que um “select from table” no já rápido mysql em acessos via tcp/ip (veja esse benchmark), o memcache pode ser usado como único mecanismo de armazenamento para aumentar bastante o [...]

]]> By: Bulletproof your server to survive Digg/Slashdot | Kev009.com http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-411990 Bulletproof your server to survive Digg/Slashdot | Kev009.com Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:42:39 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-411990 [...] true since web apps are primarily read oriented.  The query cache isn’t perfect in all situations, and in larger sites memcached is more appropriate but has its own disadvantages (see memcached [...] [...] true since web apps are primarily read oriented.  The query cache isn’t perfect in all situations, and in larger sites memcached is more appropriate but has its own disadvantages (see memcached [...]

]]> By: {|ihower.idv.tw| blog } | 實戰 memcached http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/comment-page-2/#comment-361069 {|ihower.idv.tw| blog } | 實戰 memcached Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:13:06 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/09/cache-performance-comparison/#comment-361069 [...] SQL query result 可以用 MySQL 內建 Query Cache，設定很簡單，效果很不錯 (Cache Performance Comparison。我自己的心得是很多時候你想要快取的物件其實並不是一個 SQL query [...] [...] SQL query result 可以用 MySQL 內建 Query Cache，設定很簡單，效果很不錯 (Cache Performance Comparison。我自己的心得是很多時候你想要快取的物件其實並不是一個 SQL query [...]

]]>