<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL Performance Forums</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:23:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DannyO</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-674815</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-674815</guid>
		<description>Hello all,
I am new to MySQL and have been tasked with coming up with a database that has better performance than our current proof-of-concept db.  We are VERY small, have a TINY budget, but will have a faily large database - it will grow to 2-5 TB in the future.  It&#039;s not an OLTP db, we&#039;ll be running 1 or 2 user queries against it doing large selects.  But we will constantly be adding data in the back end.

We&#039;re a windows shop but will probably be using Linux for the license cost savings.  We&#039;ll have a single server running the DB.  In people&#039;s opinion, could we get away with just adding a few large SATA disks to the server, logically making them one drive?  Or is this a recipe for disaster?  Should we go with a disk array, maybe RAID, etc?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,<br />
I am new to MySQL and have been tasked with coming up with a database that has better performance than our current proof-of-concept db.  We are VERY small, have a TINY budget, but will have a faily large database &#8211; it will grow to 2-5 TB in the future.  It&#8217;s not an OLTP db, we&#8217;ll be running 1 or 2 user queries against it doing large selects.  But we will constantly be adding data in the back end.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re a windows shop but will probably be using Linux for the license cost savings.  We&#8217;ll have a single server running the DB.  In people&#8217;s opinion, could we get away with just adding a few large SATA disks to the server, logically making them one drive?  Or is this a recipe for disaster?  Should we go with a disk array, maybe RAID, etc?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockxy</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-257199</link>
		<dc:creator>rockxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-257199</guid>
		<description>And i forgot to same we are holding 2 databases on this server

1st db is of 2.5 gb(2 Gb data + o.5 GB index)
2nd DB id of 600 MB (480 MB Data + 120 MB Index)

and in 1st database we use both Myisam and Innodb tables
and in the 2nd we use only innodb tables</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And i forgot to same we are holding 2 databases on this server</p>
<p>1st db is of 2.5 gb(2 Gb data + o.5 GB index)<br />
2nd DB id of 600 MB (480 MB Data + 120 MB Index)</p>
<p>and in 1st database we use both Myisam and Innodb tables<br />
and in the 2nd we use only innodb tables</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockxy</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-257198</link>
		<dc:creator>rockxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-257198</guid>
		<description>Hello all,

I Am new to Mysql and Need Advice about the Following settings

I use Mysq 5.0.26 version on Windows 2003 enterprise server and i configured Mysql Settings

Please have a look and let me know if they are correct

Mysql Version : 5.0.26
OS : Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition
Ram : 2 GB

Mysql Setting :

Key buffer : 200 MB
sort buffer : 2 MB
Myisam sort buffer : 350 MB
Innodb buffer pool : 700 MB
Add mem pool : 13 MB 
Log Buffer : 7 mb
query cache : 50 MB

And Some times i get &quot;Out OF Memory Error&quot;,so please let me know if i am allocating more memory to mysql

Please Help

Thanks:
Rockxy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>I Am new to Mysql and Need Advice about the Following settings</p>
<p>I use Mysq 5.0.26 version on Windows 2003 enterprise server and i configured Mysql Settings</p>
<p>Please have a look and let me know if they are correct</p>
<p>Mysql Version : 5.0.26<br />
OS : Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition<br />
Ram : 2 GB</p>
<p>Mysql Setting :</p>
<p>Key buffer : 200 MB<br />
sort buffer : 2 MB<br />
Myisam sort buffer : 350 MB<br />
Innodb buffer pool : 700 MB<br />
Add mem pool : 13 MB<br />
Log Buffer : 7 mb<br />
query cache : 50 MB</p>
<p>And Some times i get &#8220;Out OF Memory Error&#8221;,so please let me know if i am allocating more memory to mysql</p>
<p>Please Help</p>
<p>Thanks:<br />
Rockxy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-22803</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-22803</guid>
		<description>Sorry.  I do not know Spanish and this is English language blog.  If you have troubles expressing yourself in English please at least take a time to use Google Translate to do automatic translation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry.  I do not know Spanish and this is English language blog.  If you have troubles expressing yourself in English please at least take a time to use Google Translate to do automatic translation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: facundo</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-22685</link>
		<dc:creator>facundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-22685</guid>
		<description>El mysql 5.0.27 lo tengo instalado sobre un DELL 1950 (un equipo bastante potente).
El problema es que estoy tardando arriba de un minuto para establecer conexion contra las bases de dicho server, desde programas en java, paginas php y hasta desde consola.
Desde el mismo servidor conecto al mysql en forma instantanea.
Actualmente el server mantiene aproximadamente 70 conexiones a las bases.
El SO que estoy utilizando es el fedora core 6.
Gracias de antemano!
facu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El mysql 5.0.27 lo tengo instalado sobre un DELL 1950 (un equipo bastante potente).<br />
El problema es que estoy tardando arriba de un minuto para establecer conexion contra las bases de dicho server, desde programas en java, paginas php y hasta desde consola.<br />
Desde el mismo servidor conecto al mysql en forma instantanea.<br />
Actualmente el server mantiene aproximadamente 70 conexiones a las bases.<br />
El SO que estoy utilizando es el fedora core 6.<br />
Gracias de antemano!<br />
facu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Stream &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySQL Optimization Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-8674</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Stream &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySQL Optimization Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-8674</guid>
		<description>[...] Today Peter Zaitsev announced launch of new forums related to MySQL Performance questions. He says: This forum is created as free alternative to MySQL Consulting Services which we provide. If you would like to get some free help to your performance issues please use forums so everyone else could benefit from our replies. You also should get more opinions on your performance problems from other forum members. There were a lot of unrelated performance questions placed as comments and sent by email and we had to find better way to organize it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today Peter Zaitsev announced launch of new forums related to MySQL Performance questions. He says: This forum is created as free alternative to MySQL Consulting Services which we provide. If you would like to get some free help to your performance issues please use forums so everyone else could benefit from our replies. You also should get more opinions on your performance problems from other forum members. There were a lot of unrelated performance questions placed as comments and sent by email and we had to find better way to organize it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>I guess that could include anonimous users or it could be fudforum bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that could include anonimous users or it could be fudforum bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Just checked main page:
Most users ever online was 88 on Fri, 11 August 2006 12:52
We have 20 registered user(s).

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just checked main page:<br />
Most users ever online was 88 on Fri, 11 August 2006 12:52<br />
We have 20 registered user(s).</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 15:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>It seems to be all fixed so welcome to register again.
Sorry that was quite silly error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to be all fixed so welcome to register again.<br />
Sorry that was quite silly error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/comment-page-1/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2006/08/10/mysql-performance-forums/#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>Mike C. 

It looks like you tried to register while I was fixing rewrite module.
Please try again,
sorry for inconvenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike C. </p>
<p>It looks like you tried to register while I was fixing rewrite module.<br />
Please try again,<br />
sorry for inconvenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
