<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks &#8211; part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: developer99</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-807115</link>
		<dc:creator>developer99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-807115</guid>
		<description>My ISAM	InnoDB
Required full text Search	Yes	
Require Transactions		Yes
frequent select queries	Yes	
frequent insert,update,delete		Yes
Row Locking (multi processing on single table)		Yes
Relational base design		Yes

Hi, I have briefly discuss this matter by table so you can conclude which has to be chosen either innodb or MyISAM.
http://developer99.blogspot.com/2011/07/mysql-innodb-vs-myisam.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ISAM	InnoDB<br />
Required full text Search	Yes<br />
Require Transactions		Yes<br />
frequent select queries	Yes<br />
frequent insert,update,delete		Yes<br />
Row Locking (multi processing on single table)		Yes<br />
Relational base design		Yes</p>
<p>Hi, I have briefly discuss this matter by table so you can conclude which has to be chosen either innodb or MyISAM.<br />
<a href="http://developer99.blogspot.com/2011/07/mysql-innodb-vs-myisam.html" rel="nofollow">http://developer99.blogspot.com/2011/07/mysql-innodb-vs-myisam.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farrukh Mahmood</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-777262</link>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh Mahmood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 07:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-777262</guid>
		<description>hey Vadim,

You have posted some extremely useful piece of work.
I appreciate your efforts.
many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Vadim,</p>
<p>You have posted some extremely useful piece of work.<br />
I appreciate your efforts.<br />
many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ionut</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-772468</link>
		<dc:creator>ionut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 20:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-772468</guid>
		<description>Great work but you just can&#039;t compare myisam with innodb without a group by statement and 10 updates/seccond:)

I wish I could do the test by my core duo is just too slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work but you just can&#8217;t compare myisam with innodb without a group by statement and 10 updates/seccond:)</p>
<p>I wish I could do the test by my core duo is just too slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRouBLeSHooTeR</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-771604</link>
		<dc:creator>TRouBLeSHooTeR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 08:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-771604</guid>
		<description>thank you for researching.
amazing results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for researching.<br />
amazing results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DostlukVadisi Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-763536</link>
		<dc:creator>DostlukVadisi Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 15:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-763536</guid>
		<description>Thank you for information,

I useing MyISAM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for information,</p>
<p>I useing MyISAM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-751102</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-751102</guid>
		<description>Can I second 54. Shaun?

&quot;I realized that I should use transactions, but unfortunately I had to give up the â€œspeedâ€ of MyISAM for InnoDB. Your benchmarks make me feel much better about my decision. =)&quot;

This is exactly the same thing I was led to believe... I keep thinking... mmm I NEED Transactions but I don&#039;t want to lose the performance! Damn where did I get this idea from? I&#039;ve only started looking into it deeply since MySQL stated they were moving to InnoDB as their default engine and that there are so many myths surrounding MyISAM being a &#039;faster reader&#039; etc.

Thanks for the great article... now I have to get ahold of your book as I feel there is so much I do not know and I should :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I second 54. Shaun?</p>
<p>&#8220;I realized that I should use transactions, but unfortunately I had to give up the â€œspeedâ€ of MyISAM for InnoDB. Your benchmarks make me feel much better about my decision. =)&#8221;</p>
<p>This is exactly the same thing I was led to believe&#8230; I keep thinking&#8230; mmm I NEED Transactions but I don&#8217;t want to lose the performance! Damn where did I get this idea from? I&#8217;ve only started looking into it deeply since MySQL stated they were moving to InnoDB as their default engine and that there are so many myths surrounding MyISAM being a &#8216;faster reader&#8217; etc.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great article&#8230; now I have to get ahold of your book as I feel there is so much I do not know and I should <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddee</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-737968</link>
		<dc:creator>ddee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-737968</guid>
		<description>Falcon attack :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcon attack <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-730279</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-730279</guid>
		<description>Eric, you should open a transaction (BEGIN TRAN) before inserting a large number of rows, them COMMIT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, you should open a transaction (BEGIN TRAN) before inserting a large number of rows, them COMMIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-722218</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-722218</guid>
		<description>In my case, I need to insert/update 40,000+ rows quite often
InnoDB will take me around 1 hr 
compare with MyISAM only will take no more than 70 &quot;SECONDS&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my case, I need to insert/update 40,000+ rows quite often<br />
InnoDB will take me around 1 hr<br />
compare with MyISAM only will take no more than 70 &#8220;SECONDS&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-09-11 &#171; Gatunogatuno&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/comment-page-3/#comment-651681</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-09-11 &#171; Gatunogatuno&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-651681</guid>
		<description>[...] InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks â€“ part 1 &#124; MySQL Performance Blog (tags: performance innodb falcon mysql scalability) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks â€“ part 1 | MySQL Performance Blog (tags: performance innodb falcon mysql scalability) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

