<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ToyEast Cars Model Store</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-358796</link>
		<dc:creator>ToyEast Cars Model Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-358796</guid>
		<description>This is what makes Benchmarking difficult, and forces us to interpret results carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what makes Benchmarking difficult, and forces us to interpret results carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: runescape money</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-353290</link>
		<dc:creator>runescape money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-353290</guid>
		<description>InnoDB tables are mostly faster than MyISAM. The only thing MyISAM supports is full-text search which is crappy and slow on large datasets anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>InnoDB tables are mostly faster than MyISAM. The only thing MyISAM supports is full-text search which is crappy and slow on large datasets anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highscalability.com and some funny comments they make&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-351912</link>
		<dc:creator>highscalability.com and some funny comments they make&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-351912</guid>
		<description>[...] InnoDB tables are mostly faster than MyISAM. The only thing MyISAM supports is full-text search which is crappy and slow on large datasets anyway. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] InnoDB tables are mostly faster than MyISAM. The only thing MyISAM supports is full-text search which is crappy and slow on large datasets anyway. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itix</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-348235</link>
		<dc:creator>itix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-348235</guid>
		<description>Once we query the log table we read over the logs. Our table handler did very well with it. For each thread we performed the warm-up run (duration 180 sec), and then ran three effective runs (duration of each is 60 sec). Only problem our final result was much different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once we query the log table we read over the logs. Our table handler did very well with it. For each thread we performed the warm-up run (duration 180 sec), and then ran three effective runs (duration of each is 60 sec). Only problem our final result was much different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flexible coupling</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339886</link>
		<dc:creator>flexible coupling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339886</guid>
		<description>so great !
I'll miss you!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so great !<br />
I&#8217;ll miss you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamboo Clothing</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339885</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamboo Clothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339885</guid>
		<description>[url=http://www.budrert.com/]dfd[/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[url=http://www.budrert.com/]dfd[/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ere</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339884</link>
		<dc:creator>ere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339884</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bdrecert.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;dr/a&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bdrecert.com/" rel="nofollow">dr/a&gt;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fff</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339466</link>
		<dc:creator>fff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339466</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dp10039284.lolipop.jp/fudia/" rel="nofollow"&gt;フーディア ダイエット&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://dp10039284.lolipop.jp/disney/" rel="nofollow"&gt;ディズニーモバイル&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://dp10039284.lolipop.jp/bcy/" rel="nofollow"&gt;電動自転車&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dp10039284.lolipop.jp/fudia/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/dp10039284.lolipop.jp');">フーディア ダイエット</a><br />
<a href="http://dp10039284.lolipop.jp/disney/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/dp10039284.lolipop.jp');">ディズニーモバイル</a><br />
<a href="http://dp10039284.lolipop.jp/bcy/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/dp10039284.lolipop.jp');">電動自転車</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: learn</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339367</link>
		<dc:creator>learn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-339367</guid>
		<description>integridad referencial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>integridad referencial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nike shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-326862</link>
		<dc:creator>nike shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/#comment-326862</guid>
		<description>vccc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vccc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
