Comments on: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1

By: Ihsan » Revisi Paper Seminar

Ihsan » Revisi Paper Seminar — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:50:59 +0000

[...] - http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1/ [...]

By: roga’s blog » MySQL 資料庫儲存引擎的選用

roga’s blog » MySQL 資料庫儲存引擎的選用 — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:29:11 +0000

[...] 我找到一篇文章針對 MyIASM, InnoDB 和 Falcon 來做比較，在這裡面 MyIASM和 InnoDB 表現都沒有差很多，唯獨在測 READ_PK_RANGE 和 READ_KEY_POINT 時候， MyIASM 爛掉了(不過主角其實是 Falcon 因為它被打趴了)。原因是：There MyISAM shows bad scalability with increasing count of thread. I think the reason is pread system call MyISAM uses to access data and retrieving from OS cache is not scaled. InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 1 [...]

By: viacesi » Archive du blog » Donc Oracle rachète Sun !

viacesi » Archive du blog » Donc Oracle rachète Sun ! — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:40:38 +0000

[...] MySQL avait choisi Falcon, une autre technologie en vue de la sortie de la version 6. En terme de performances, Falcon est encore très loin de rivaliser avec InnoDB.Sur Java, Mark Shuttleworth ne croit pas [...]

By: Andy

Andy — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:02:43 +0000

This test is not neutral. MyISAM is disadvantaged from the beginning, since MyISAM is optimized to be used in combination with CHAR fields in contrast to VARCHAR fields. This given, MyISAM is optimized for read access when fixed row size is given.
To make a statement comparing the InnoDB and MyISAM engine the table has to be set up differently for MyISAM. Then it would be very interesting to see the results especially concerning reads for MyISAM compared to InnoDB and Falcon. Likely MyISAM will beat InnoDB is at least some of the stated queries above.

By: iGuide

iGuide — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:18:07 +0000

How about a speed test with a MyISAM-packed table vs InnoDB? InnoDB’s great, but if you’re uploading massive tables back and forth to your server, MyISAM will be less of a hassle due to much smaller files.

By: Dexter

Dexter — Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:57:49 +0000

Very intresting, i think i should migrate to InnoDB with my site’s.

By: MySQL: InnoDB vs MyISAM | vdwaardenburg.nl

MySQL: InnoDB vs MyISAM | vdwaardenburg.nl — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:29:08 +0000

[...] used engines are InnoDB and MyISAM. But, what are the advantages of using InnoDB vs MyISAM ? InnoDB seems to be faster, but what are the advantages and disadvantages while using InnoDB or MyISAM [...]

By: runescape money

runescape money — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:24:19 +0000

InnoDB tables are mostly faster than MyISAM. The only thing MyISAM supports is full-text search which is crappy and slow on large datasets anyway

By: highscalability.com and some funny comments they make…

highscalability.com and some funny comments they make… — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:46:46 +0000

[...] InnoDB tables are mostly faster than MyISAM. The only thing MyISAM supports is full-text search which is crappy and slow on large datasets anyway. [...]

By: itix

itix — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:27:21 +0000

Once we query the log table we read over the logs. Our table handler did very well with it. For each thread we performed the warm-up run (duration 180 sec), and then ran three effective runs (duration of each is 60 sec). Only problem our final result was much different.