<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innodb Recovery - Is large buffer pool always better ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/#comment-146247</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/#comment-146247</guid>
		<description>Heikki Filed it as Bug:

http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=29847

So lets see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heikki Filed it as Bug:</p>
<p><a href="http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=29847" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=29847</a></p>
<p>So lets see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
