<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innodb Recovery &#8211; Is large buffer pool always better ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: domas mituzas: vaporware, inc. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Progress in percents: 0 1 2 3 &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-366182</link>
		<dc:creator>domas mituzas: vaporware, inc. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Progress in percents: 0 1 2 3 &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/#comment-366182</guid>
		<description>[...] this is old stuff. Peter wrote about it, Heikki opened a bug, then thought it would need more than five minutes to fix it and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this is old stuff. Peter wrote about it, Heikki opened a bug, then thought it would need more than five minutes to fix it and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How quickly you should expect to see bugs fixed &#124; MySQL Performance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-351944</link>
		<dc:creator>How quickly you should expect to see bugs fixed &#124; MySQL Performance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/#comment-351944</guid>
		<description>[...] a year ago I wrote about pretty nasty Innodb Recovery Bug. I ran in the same situation again (different system, different customer) and went to see the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a year ago I wrote about pretty nasty Innodb Recovery Bug. I ran in the same situation again (different system, different customer) and went to see the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/comment-page-1/#comment-146247</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/17/innodb-recovery-is-large-buffer-pool-always-better/#comment-146247</guid>
		<description>Heikki Filed it as Bug:

http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=29847

So lets see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heikki Filed it as Bug:</p>
<p><a href="http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=29847" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=29847</a></p>
<p>So lets see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

