<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Gotchas with MySQL 5.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:23:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-588916</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-588916</guid>
		<description>Laine,

Yes, and actually it is fixed in mysql binaries also (5.0.80+)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laine,</p>
<p>Yes, and actually it is fixed in mysql binaries also (5.0.80+)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laine</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-588888</link>
		<dc:creator>Laine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-588888</guid>
		<description>Has this been addressed in the percona binaries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has this been addressed in the percona binaries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pero on anything &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SHOW STATUS considered harmful</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-354431</link>
		<dc:creator>pero on anything &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SHOW STATUS considered harmful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-354431</guid>
		<description>[...] Peter Zaitev points out calling SHOW STATUS might have a huge performance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peter Zaitev points out calling SHOW STATUS might have a huge performance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domas mituzas: vaporware, inc. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Performance of status commands</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-305368</link>
		<dc:creator>domas mituzas: vaporware, inc. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Performance of status commands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-305368</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a year ago about performance regression in &#8216;SHOW STATUS&#8217;. Of course, now that Mark has filed a bug [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a year ago about performance regression in &#8216;SHOW STATUS&#8217;. Of course, now that Mark has filed a bug [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasil Dimov</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-301282</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasil Dimov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-301282</guid>
		<description>Patch that removes the variable Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_latched from SHOW STATUS has been committed in InnoDB 5.0 and 5.1, follow the bug report: http://bugs.mysql.com/36600</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patch that removes the variable Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_latched from SHOW STATUS has been committed in InnoDB 5.0 and 5.1, follow the bug report: <a href="http://bugs.mysql.com/36600" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.mysql.com/36600</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-299587</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-299587</guid>
		<description>Oh yes indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasil Dimov</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-299534</link>
		<dc:creator>Vasil Dimov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-299534</guid>
		<description>Hmm,

Peter, do you mean SHOW STATUS instead of SHOW INNODB STATUS?
buf_get_latched_pages_number() is called when SHOW STATUS is executed, it is not called when SHOW INNODB STATUS is executed.

I have prepared a simple patch that removes the Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_latched variable from SHOW STATUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm,</p>
<p>Peter, do you mean SHOW STATUS instead of SHOW INNODB STATUS?<br />
buf_get_latched_pages_number() is called when SHOW STATUS is executed, it is not called when SHOW INNODB STATUS is executed.</p>
<p>I have prepared a simple patch that removes the Innodb_buffer_pool_pages_latched variable from SHOW STATUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-299528</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-299528</guid>
		<description>Heikki,

Thanks this is good change. 
I know you guys read bugs and listen to our feedback but it is not exactly the same as dealing with Innodb in production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heikki,</p>
<p>Thanks this is good change.<br />
I know you guys read bugs and listen to our feedback but it is not exactly the same as dealing with Innodb in production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-299527</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-299527</guid>
		<description>Vasil,

I think it is not the time SHOW INNODB STATUS take which is important but the fact other queries starve waiting on innodb buffer pool which can be significant. I&#039;ve seen hundreds of queries to be queued this way which  then released at once and cause significant resource competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vasil,</p>
<p>I think it is not the time SHOW INNODB STATUS take which is important but the fact other queries starve waiting on innodb buffer pool which can be significant. I&#8217;ve seen hundreds of queries to be queued this way which  then released at once and cause significant resource competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heikki Tuuri</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/comment-page-1/#comment-299515</link>
		<dc:creator>Heikki Tuuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/07/27/more-gotchas-with-mysql-50/#comment-299515</guid>
		<description>All,

we are going to remove the loop to calculate buf_get_latched_pages_number from the standard build of mysqld. We may keep it in the UNIV_DEBUG build.

Since SHOW INNODB STATUS\G prints all reserved latches, people can get the information, and in a much more detailed form, from SHOW INNODB STATUS\G.

###

Concerning the &quot;disconnectedness of InnoDB developers&quot; from the MySQL user base, InnoDB developers look at bugs.mysql.com every day. And consulting companies like Percona exist, who give us feedback :).

Regards,

Heikki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All,</p>
<p>we are going to remove the loop to calculate buf_get_latched_pages_number from the standard build of mysqld. We may keep it in the UNIV_DEBUG build.</p>
<p>Since SHOW INNODB STATUS\G prints all reserved latches, people can get the information, and in a much more detailed form, from SHOW INNODB STATUS\G.</p>
<p>###</p>
<p>Concerning the &#8220;disconnectedness of InnoDB developers&#8221; from the MySQL user base, InnoDB developers look at bugs.mysql.com every day. And consulting companies like Percona exist, who give us feedback <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Heikki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
