<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guess what?! Microsecond slow query timing finally available in MySQL!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-163690</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/surprise-surprise/#comment-163690</guid>
		<description>Jay,

We new it is in the queue for 5.1 but were surprised it was included that quickly.
I guess as  MySQL 5.1 is getting close to &quot;GA&quot; release it just become &quot;now or never&quot; question :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>We new it is in the queue for 5.1 but were surprised it was included that quickly.<br />
I guess as  MySQL 5.1 is getting close to &#8220;GA&#8221; release it just become &#8220;now or never&#8221; question <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Pipes</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-162869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Pipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/surprise-surprise/#comment-162869</guid>
		<description>And on a more general note, why on Earth were you not notified by our development team that your patch had been included in 5.1?  This is troubling for us in the community team, as we want our contributors to feel the love from MySQL and not be ignored.  I&#039;ll check into this...

Thanks, Maciek, for your patch!

-jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on a more general note, why on Earth were you not notified by our development team that your patch had been included in 5.1?  This is troubling for us in the community team, as we want our contributors to feel the love from MySQL and not be ignored.  I&#8217;ll check into this&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, Maciek, for your patch!</p>
<p>-jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexey Kovyrin</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-161369</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexey Kovyrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/surprise-surprise/#comment-161369</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Maciek! Now we need to wait for final 5.1 release and then we&#039;ll be able to use it w/o all these boring patching procedures. Looks like 5.1 is going to give us really great set of new features which will make mysql even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Maciek! Now we need to wait for final 5.1 release and then we&#8217;ll be able to use it w/o all these boring patching procedures. Looks like 5.1 is going to give us really great set of new features which will make mysql even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Mikhailian</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-161320</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Mikhailian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/surprise-surprise/#comment-161320</guid>
		<description>Gongratulations from the developers tired to recompile their MySQL everytime they needed a new version, just to include you (in)famous patch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gongratulations from the developers tired to recompile their MySQL everytime they needed a new version, just to include you (in)famous patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/microsecond-slow-query-timing-finally-available-in-mysql/comment-page-1/#comment-161259</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/08/29/surprise-surprise/#comment-161259</guid>
		<description>Maciek,

How was it done for table format - previously there was TIME column for query execution time which did not support fractions of seconds in MySQL - was data type extended or the column changed to different type ? 

Also was only pure timing support added to the MySQL 5.1.20 or were other features you&#039;ve implemented, such as logging slow queries from replication thread as well and having rows examined and rows updated in the slow query log added as well.

In any case it is great news Monty finally pulled the trigger on this one as it was long overdue.  He also told me he planned to see if more efficient platform specific timing could be used on some platforms - did you see if there are any changes in this respect ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maciek,</p>
<p>How was it done for table format &#8211; previously there was TIME column for query execution time which did not support fractions of seconds in MySQL &#8211; was data type extended or the column changed to different type ? </p>
<p>Also was only pure timing support added to the MySQL 5.1.20 or were other features you&#8217;ve implemented, such as logging slow queries from replication thread as well and having rows examined and rows updated in the slow query log added as well.</p>
<p>In any case it is great news Monty finally pulled the trigger on this one as it was long overdue.  He also told me he planned to see if more efficient platform specific timing could be used on some platforms &#8211; did you see if there are any changes in this respect ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

