<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CentOS Comes with free build of MySQL Enterprise ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-232652</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-232652</guid>
		<description>Ah thanks Jeremy.  I just expected to see RPMs similar as they are available for download from dev.mysql.com, thanks for clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah thanks Jeremy.  I just expected to see RPMs similar as they are available for download from dev.mysql.com, thanks for clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Charles Agenda &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CentOS, CentOSPlus, and MySQL versions shipping there</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-231268</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Charles Agenda &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CentOS, CentOSPlus, and MySQL versions shipping there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-231268</guid>
		<description>[...] posted that CentOS comes with a build of MySQL Enterprise. It should really be clarified that CentOS itself, comes with MySQL Community, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted that CentOS comes with a build of MySQL Enterprise. It should really be clarified that CentOS itself, comes with MySQL Community, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-231258</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-231258</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

We have updated the mirror.  I apologize for it being out of date, it&#039;s my fault. :)

Actually there are CentOS/RHEL binaries as RPMs there, but all RPMs for each set are packaged together as a .tar file, as MySQL provides them.  For example, mysql-enterprise-gpl-5.0.54-0.rhel4.x86_64.tar.

Regards,

Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>We have updated the mirror.  I apologize for it being out of date, it&#8217;s my fault. <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Actually there are CentOS/RHEL binaries as RPMs there, but all RPMs for each set are packaged together as a .tar file, as MySQL provides them.  For example, mysql-enterprise-gpl-5.0.54-0.rhel4.x86_64.tar.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-229985</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-229985</guid>
		<description>It looks like this is only in CentOS4 centosplus by now. Though as srpm is available you should be able to rebuild it on 5 with no problems. 

Regarding using Community vs Enterprise version - in most cases Community is quite as good and it can contain more features.  I&#039;ve seen couple of bugs in community which were not in enterprise but it is vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like this is only in CentOS4 centosplus by now. Though as srpm is available you should be able to rebuild it on 5 with no problems. </p>
<p>Regarding using Community vs Enterprise version &#8211; in most cases Community is quite as good and it can contain more features.  I&#8217;ve seen couple of bugs in community which were not in enterprise but it is vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-229348</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-229348</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eric,

Though it looks like you do not have 5.0.54 Enterprise yet, 
Also there are no RPM binaries only RPM sources   which is much better than tarballs of you want to build and distribute RPMS but it requires more work than binaries itself.

Though I understand you do not have bandwidth to provide set of binaries for everything. My point is still there is a value in CentOS binaries :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eric,</p>
<p>Though it looks like you do not have 5.0.54 Enterprise yet,<br />
Also there are no RPM binaries only RPM sources   which is much better than tarballs of you want to build and distribute RPMS but it requires more work than binaries itself.</p>
<p>Though I understand you do not have bandwidth to provide set of binaries for everything. My point is still there is a value in CentOS binaries <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Bergen</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-227961</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Bergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-227961</guid>
		<description>Proven Scaling provides a mirror for the MySQL Enterprise binaries and source code. As Peter said these are released under the GPL license. We get these directly from MySQL so they are the exact same files you can get with an Enterprise subscription. 

The mirror is here:
http://mirror.provenscaling.com/mysql/enterprise/

The official announcement is toward the end of this blog entry:
http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/08/09/mysql-community-split-officially-a-failure/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proven Scaling provides a mirror for the MySQL Enterprise binaries and source code. As Peter said these are released under the GPL license. We get these directly from MySQL so they are the exact same files you can get with an Enterprise subscription. </p>
<p>The mirror is here:<br />
<a href="http://mirror.provenscaling.com/mysql/enterprise/" rel="nofollow">http://mirror.provenscaling.com/mysql/enterprise/</a></p>
<p>The official announcement is toward the end of this blog entry:<br />
<a href="http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/08/09/mysql-community-split-officially-a-failure/" rel="nofollow">http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/08/09/mysql-community-split-officially-a-failure/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-227729</link>
		<dc:creator>aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 12:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-227729</guid>
		<description>Are there 32bit builds available? I can&#039;t see anything in the centosplus repo for centos5 x86</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there 32bit builds available? I can&#8217;t see anything in the centosplus repo for centos5 x86</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howa</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-227671</link>
		<dc:creator>howa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-227671</guid>
		<description>So it is recommended to use this version for production server, rather than those community version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is recommended to use this version for production server, rather than those community version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-227525</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-227525</guid>
		<description>Kostas,

If I understand correctly  MySQL gives Enterprise sources to RedHat so it becomes part of RHEL.  These sources are under  GPL and publicly available from RedHat together with other GPL packages.    CentOS guys took these sources and built it. 

Also note - MySQL Enterprise Sources are still available from MySQL, they are just made rather inconvenient and not very visible:
http://mysql.bkbits.net/

Agree with you :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kostas,</p>
<p>If I understand correctly  MySQL gives Enterprise sources to RedHat so it becomes part of RHEL.  These sources are under  GPL and publicly available from RedHat together with other GPL packages.    CentOS guys took these sources and built it. </p>
<p>Also note &#8211; MySQL Enterprise Sources are still available from MySQL, they are just made rather inconvenient and not very visible:<br />
<a href="http://mysql.bkbits.net/" rel="nofollow">http://mysql.bkbits.net/</a></p>
<p>Agree with you <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kostas</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-227516</link>
		<dc:creator>Kostas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/01/04/centos-comes-with-free-build-of-mysql-enterprise/#comment-227516</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that one of MySQL AB&#039;s paying customers &quot;leaked&quot; the source of the Enterprise version (which is their right to do) or I missed something? Once again the Enterprise schema is proved stupid, which is a shame since a good schema would benefit both the community and paying customers, as Baron explains in his very nice post:
http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that one of MySQL AB&#8217;s paying customers &#8220;leaked&#8221; the source of the Enterprise version (which is their right to do) or I missed something? Once again the Enterprise schema is proved stupid, which is a shame since a good schema would benefit both the community and paying customers, as Baron explains in his very nice post:<br />
<a href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

