<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Partially OpenSourced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Garreth Weldon</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-284292</link>
		<dc:creator>Garreth Weldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-284292</guid>
		<description>When MySQL introduced MySQL Network, we saw the first closed source software ("the virtual dba") from MySQL.
Now MySQL Enterprise becomes closed source.
You know why MySQL is doing this?
To make money. Simpel. 
Making money with services around an open source product is tough: everybody can do this.
People from Yahoo and Google offer MySQL performance &#38; tuning consulting for $100.
That's something different than a 3-day performance &#38; tuning gig from MySQL for $6.000.
As MySQL is being used in no-so-mission-critical systems, there's no need to buy support services from them.

So, how to make money with MySQL?
Offer features for money, and make it a little-bit closed source....like a little bit pregnant....
If you need enterprise features from an open source database, look for Postgres or Ingres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When MySQL introduced MySQL Network, we saw the first closed source software (&#8221;the virtual dba&#8221;) from MySQL.<br />
Now MySQL Enterprise becomes closed source.<br />
You know why MySQL is doing this?<br />
To make money. Simpel.<br />
Making money with services around an open source product is tough: everybody can do this.<br />
People from Yahoo and Google offer MySQL performance &amp; tuning consulting for $100.<br />
That&#8217;s something different than a 3-day performance &amp; tuning gig from MySQL for $6.000.<br />
As MySQL is being used in no-so-mission-critical systems, there&#8217;s no need to buy support services from them.</p>
<p>So, how to make money with MySQL?<br />
Offer features for money, and make it a little-bit closed source&#8230;.like a little bit pregnant&#8230;.<br />
If you need enterprise features from an open source database, look for Postgres or Ingres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Log Buffer #93: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-281503</link>
		<dc:creator>Log Buffer #93: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-281503</guid>
		<description>[...] the MySQL Performance Blog, Vadim opines that MySQL is partially open-sourced. Marten, among others, shows up again with a rebutting comment or two. He must be a very busy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the MySQL Performance Blog, Vadim opines that MySQL is partially open-sourced. Marten, among others, shows up again with a rebutting comment or two. He must be a very busy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topbit</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-281153</link>
		<dc:creator>topbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-281153</guid>
		<description>For me, it's about the enterprise edition having less testing than the community version.  It might have more, and shinier features, but they have already released enterprise editions with significant bugs or what would be classed experimental features anywhere else.  It's got to be contrasted with RHEL/Fedora - the more experimental stuff goes out to the wider community to help nail down the problems that can only be found by widespread use, and you know when you use some of FC's more experimental features that there may be problems - thats the price to pay for the new toys.  When it's settled down, those features get put into RHEL, and businesses know it's going to be stable, since it's already been well tested by a wider community.

As the SheBA says at http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/05/14/breakdown-in-mysql-enterprise-process/ 
 - Enterprise: more features + less vetting = more breaking
And she's not alone in that thread.

http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/ says much the same, with in depth reasons that match my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, it&#8217;s about the enterprise edition having less testing than the community version.  It might have more, and shinier features, but they have already released enterprise editions with significant bugs or what would be classed experimental features anywhere else.  It&#8217;s got to be contrasted with RHEL/Fedora - the more experimental stuff goes out to the wider community to help nail down the problems that can only be found by widespread use, and you know when you use some of FC&#8217;s more experimental features that there may be problems - thats the price to pay for the new toys.  When it&#8217;s settled down, those features get put into RHEL, and businesses know it&#8217;s going to be stable, since it&#8217;s already been well tested by a wider community.</p>
<p>As the SheBA says at <a href="http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/05/14/breakdown-in-mysql-enterprise-process/" rel="nofollow">http://jcole.us/blog/archives/2007/05/14/breakdown-in-mysql-enterprise-process/</a><br />
 - Enterprise: more features + less vetting = more breaking<br />
And she&#8217;s not alone in that thread.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2007/08/12/what-would-make-me-buy-mysql-enterprise/</a> says much the same, with in depth reasons that match my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL&#8217;s non-GPL adventure &#124; All things Sysadmin</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-281085</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL&#8217;s non-GPL adventure &#124; All things Sysadmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-281085</guid>
		<description>[...] available to paying Enterprise customers. A lot of people have been writing about it, Jeremy Cole, Vadim Tkachenko and Don MacAskill and they all have valid points in both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] available to paying Enterprise customers. A lot of people have been writing about it, Jeremy Cole, Vadim Tkachenko and Don MacAskill and they all have valid points in both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL reserves features for paying customers &#124; InfoWorld &#124; News &#124; 2008-04-17 &#124; By Eric Lai, Computerworld</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280608</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL reserves features for paying customers &#124; InfoWorld &#124; News &#124; 2008-04-17 &#124; By Eric Lai, Computerworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280608</guid>
		<description>[...] not MySQL believe in open source? Or just partially believe?" asked Vadim Tkachenko in a blog post. Tkachenko, a former MySQL employee who now works as a consultant at Percona Inc., said that while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not MySQL believe in open source? Or just partially believe?&#8221; asked Vadim Tkachenko in a blog post. Tkachenko, a former MySQL employee who now works as a consultant at Percona Inc., said that while [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovid</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280464</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280464</guid>
		<description>This is great news!  We've contemplated switching over to PostgreSQL for a while.  Numerous MySQL bugs (always with the promise that it's fixed in $version + 1) have frustrated our ability to to provide robust software.  This news has pushed us over the edge.  PostgreSQL is not officially supported in-house, but this news is the impetus we've needed to finally reconsider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news!  We&#8217;ve contemplated switching over to PostgreSQL for a while.  Numerous MySQL bugs (always with the promise that it&#8217;s fixed in $version + 1) have frustrated our ability to to provide robust software.  This news has pushed us over the edge.  PostgreSQL is not officially supported in-house, but this news is the impetus we&#8217;ve needed to finally reconsider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Management &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySQL Reserves Some Features</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280056</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Management &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MySQL Reserves Some Features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280056</guid>
		<description>[...] not MySQL believe in open source? Or just partially believe?&#8221; asked Vadim Tkachenko in a blog post. Tkachenko, a former MySQL employee who now works as a consultant at Percona Inc., said that while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not MySQL believe in open source? Or just partially believe?&#8221; asked Vadim Tkachenko in a blog post. Tkachenko, a former MySQL employee who now works as a consultant at Percona Inc., said that while [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL reserves features for paying customers; open-source community up in arms &#183; Technologyland News, Education, Headlines,Security, Storage ,Networking, Information on Hardware, Software for Laptops ,Desktops</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280028</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL reserves features for paying customers; open-source community up in arms &#183; Technologyland News, Education, Headlines,Security, Storage ,Networking, Information on Hardware, Software for Laptops ,Desktops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-280028</guid>
		<description>[...] not MySQL believe in open source? Or just partially believe?&#8221; asked Vadim Tkachenko in a blog post. Tkachenko, a former MySQL employee who now works as a consultant at Percona Inc., said that while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not MySQL believe in open source? Or just partially believe?&#8221; asked Vadim Tkachenko in a blog post. Tkachenko, a former MySQL employee who now works as a consultant at Percona Inc., said that while [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marten Mickos</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-279980</link>
		<dc:creator>Marten Mickos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-279980</guid>
		<description>Vadim,

Thx. Good point. 

I would also hope that someone could make a proposal for a business model that would be better than what we have come up with. We would love to hear if there is one. (Joshua Drake did claim on another blog that he has one, so I need to ask him what he has come up with.)

Marten</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim,</p>
<p>Thx. Good point. </p>
<p>I would also hope that someone could make a proposal for a business model that would be better than what we have come up with. We would love to hear if there is one. (Joshua Drake did claim on another blog that he has one, so I need to ask him what he has come up with.)</p>
<p>Marten</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-279876</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/04/15/partially-opensourced/#comment-279876</guid>
		<description>Marten,

Thank you for commenting in our blog, we really appreciate that.

You are right we do not need to argue here, I am fully understand MySQL is experimenting with business model, we do that same in our company.

The reason I started this discussion is to let you know that a lot of community members do not fully accept what MySQL is going to do, and that maybe important information to make final decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marten,</p>
<p>Thank you for commenting in our blog, we really appreciate that.</p>
<p>You are right we do not need to argue here, I am fully understand MySQL is experimenting with business model, we do that same in our company.</p>
<p>The reason I started this discussion is to let you know that a lot of community members do not fully accept what MySQL is going to do, and that maybe important information to make final decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
