Comments on: XtraDB storage engine release 1.0.2-2 (New Year edition) http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/ Everything about MySQL Performance Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:35:44 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: perde modelleri http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-673033 perde modelleri Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:33:03 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-673033 Yes, it replaces InnoDB as default storage engine Yes, it replaces InnoDB as default storage engine

]]>
By: Laine http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-533068 Laine Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:44:43 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-533068 Vadim, I have a client who is in need of this for 5.0 and we'd consider sponsoring. Please email me at laine@palominodb.com to discuss further. Thank you, Laine Vadim, I have a client who is in need of this for 5.0 and we’d consider sponsoring. Please email me at laine@palominodb.com to discuss further.

Thank you,
Laine

]]>
By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-532848 Vadim Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:51:08 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-532848 Laine, No, XtraDB plugin is available only for 5.1, but we can port patch for 5.0 for percona builds. Laine,

No, XtraDB plugin is available only for 5.1, but we can port patch for 5.0 for percona builds.

]]>
By: Laine http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-532841 Laine Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:43:03 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-532841 so can we use the xtra plugin in a 5.0 percona build to take advantage of > 1024 innodb txns? so can we use the xtra plugin in a 5.0 percona build to take advantage of > 1024 innodb txns?

]]>
By: perde http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-518555 perde Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:05:02 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-518555 Thanks you Thanks you

]]>
By: Zoran http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443164 Zoran Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:31:08 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-443164 Thanks for that information i think i'll try this in a vm. Thanks for that information i think i’ll try this in a vm.

]]>
By: Evgeny Stepchenko http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-438986 Evgeny Stepchenko Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:48:25 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-438986 Richard, Yes, it replaces InnoDB as default storage engine Richard,

Yes, it replaces InnoDB as default storage engine

]]>
By: Richard Dale http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-432645 Richard Dale Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:23:05 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-432645 Regarding "as binaries, percona xtradb is compiled in into MySQL-5.1.30 RPM" - does this mean that XtraDB is the default InnoDB storage engine in the server RPM file or does it still need to be enabled via the loadable modules method? Regarding “as binaries, percona xtradb is compiled in into MySQL-5.1.30 RPM” – does this mean that XtraDB is the default InnoDB storage engine in the server RPM file or does it still need to be enabled via the loadable modules method?

]]>
By: Emlak http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradb-storage-engine-release-102-2/comment-page-1/#comment-431708 Emlak Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:39:21 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=581#comment-431708 thanks for information thanks for information

]]>