Comments on: XtraDB/InnoDB CPU bound benchmarks on 24cores server http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/ Everything about MySQL Performance Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:23:57 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Torsten Brumm http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/comment-page-1/#comment-483290 Torsten Brumm Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:07:32 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=577#comment-483290 @Vadim, pls mail me directly your needs and i will sent you details about login ;-) Would be interessting to see your results, we only use this box (we have two) for 10% max....never saw a higher load on the box.... @Vadim,
pls mail me directly your needs and i will sent you details about login ;-)

Would be interessting to see your results, we only use this box (we have two) for 10% max….never saw a higher load on the box….

]]> By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/comment-page-1/#comment-482552 Vadim Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:41:45 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=577#comment-482552 Torsten, That would be interesting ! Torsten,

That would be interesting !

]]> By: Torsten Brumm http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/comment-page-1/#comment-482295 Torsten Brumm Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:22:34 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=577#comment-482295 Hi Vadim, did you like to do this test on a 64 Core System with a lot of RAM again ;-) ? Hi Vadim, did you like to do this test on a 64 Core System with a lot of RAM again ;-) ?

]]> By: peter http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/comment-page-1/#comment-429564 peter Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:36:58 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=577#comment-429564 Interesting point though. This is how things degrade with unrestricted concurrency... Often you can get better performance restricting Innodb Thread Concurrency... but our goal is rather fixing internal scaling limits so it is not required. Interesting point though. This is how things degrade with unrestricted concurrency… Often you can get better performance restricting Innodb Thread Concurrency… but our goal is rather fixing internal scaling limits so it is not required.

]]> By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/comment-page-1/#comment-429538 Vadim Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:57:13 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=577#comment-429538 Dim, Nope I did not. I know it may fix scalability a bit, but innodb_thread_concurrency=16 on 24-cores box does not make sense. Dim,

Nope I did not.
I know it may fix scalability a bit, but innodb_thread_concurrency=16 on 24-cores box does not make sense.

]]> By: dim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/12/29/xtradbinnodb-cpu-bound-benchmarks-on-24cores-server/comment-page-1/#comment-429407 dim Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:04:29 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=577#comment-429407 Hi Vadim, did you try to replay the same tests with innodb_thread_concurrency=16 ? Rgds, -Dim Hi Vadim,

did you try to replay the same tests with innodb_thread_concurrency=16 ?

Rgds,
-Dim

]]>