<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSD, XFS, LVM, fsync, write cache, barrier and lost transactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:23:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baron Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-611795</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-611795</guid>
		<description>Peter [Eisentraut], I&#039;ve been following your benchmark blog posts with a lot of interest, too :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter [Eisentraut], I&#8217;ve been following your benchmark blog posts with a lot of interest, too <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-611212</link>
		<dc:creator>http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-611212</guid>
		<description>I meant http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2009/07/solid-state-drive-benchmarks-and-write.html ... funny markup ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant <a href="http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2009/07/solid-state-drive-benchmarks-and-write.html" rel="nofollow">http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2009/07/solid-state-drive-benchmarks-and-write.html</a> &#8230; funny markup &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-611211</link>
		<dc:creator>http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-611211</guid>
		<description>Somewhat after the fact I realized that this information relates closely with the SSD tests I did with PostgreSQL, reported here: .  With a plain dd test I get about 50% performance loss when turning the write cache off on the X25-E.  That&#039;s much better than the more than fourfold loss you are observing (if I parse your numbers right).  I&#039;m planning to do a pgbench test later, which might provide more insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat after the fact I realized that this information relates closely with the SSD tests I did with PostgreSQL, reported here: .  With a plain dd test I get about 50% performance loss when turning the write cache off on the X25-E.  That&#8217;s much better than the more than fourfold loss you are observing (if I parse your numbers right).  I&#8217;m planning to do a pgbench test later, which might provide more insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-530886</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-530886</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the broad consensus in the room was &quot;these things are worth a lot less if they lie to the operating system about durability, and a UPS is not an acceptable workaround&quot; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the broad consensus in the room was &#8220;these things are worth a lot less if they lie to the operating system about durability, and a UPS is not an acceptable workaround&#8221; <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-530885</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-530885</guid>
		<description>Jignesh presented on a similar topic at the PostgreSQL conference this weekend.  Slides are at http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/effects_of_flash_ssd_on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jignesh presented on a similar topic at the PostgreSQL conference this weekend.  Slides are at <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/effects_of_flash_ssd_on" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/effects_of_flash_ssd_on</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-523661</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-523661</guid>
		<description>True, but even lower cost servers come with redundant power supplies as an option.  I certainly wouldn&#039;t specify a server for mission critical database data without redundant PSU&#039;s.

B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but even lower cost servers come with redundant power supplies as an option.  I certainly wouldn&#8217;t specify a server for mission critical database data without redundant PSU&#8217;s.</p>
<p>B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-523261</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-523261</guid>
		<description>A UPS isn&#039;t the whole solution.  What happens when your power supply (the one inside the server) fails, for example?  &quot;Keep the power from going off&quot; and &quot;keep the server from crashing&quot; are not the same thing as &quot;I want this device not to lie when I ask for this data to be written to durable storage.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A UPS isn&#8217;t the whole solution.  What happens when your power supply (the one inside the server) fails, for example?  &#8220;Keep the power from going off&#8221; and &#8220;keep the server from crashing&#8221; are not the same thing as &#8220;I want this device not to lie when I ask for this data to be written to durable storage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-522493</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Callaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-522493</guid>
		<description>When will Amazon provide a UPS on EC2 servers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will Amazon provide a UPS on EC2 servers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-522416</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-522416</guid>
		<description>@ Justmy2cents,

I totally agree.  Who isn&#039;t running UPS&#039;s on their DB servers?  Even an old one that could hold the system on for 30 seconds would be enough, as long as further transactions didn&#039;t keep coming in during that time.

B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Justmy2cents,</p>
<p>I totally agree.  Who isn&#8217;t running UPS&#8217;s on their DB servers?  Even an old one that could hold the system on for 30 seconds would be enough, as long as further transactions didn&#8217;t keep coming in during that time.</p>
<p>B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justmy2cents</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/comment-page-1/#comment-514266</link>
		<dc:creator>justmy2cents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=631#comment-514266</guid>
		<description>Why not just adding an UPS to ur system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just adding an UPS to ur system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
