Comments on: Percona at PHP Quebec 09 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/10/percona-at-php-quebec-09/ Everything about MySQL Performance Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:23:57 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Rich http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/10/percona-at-php-quebec-09/comment-page-1/#comment-502630 Rich Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:49:06 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=641#comment-502630 Great set of slides - very useful for someone who hasn't played with indexes that much; looking forward to some speed increases! Great set of slides – very useful for someone who hasn’t played with indexes that much; looking forward to some speed increases!

]]> By: Henrik Ingo http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/10/percona-at-php-quebec-09/comment-page-1/#comment-502418 Henrik Ingo Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:51:30 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=641#comment-502418 Morgan, I like your trick questions. Nice style, I'll probably copy it to my own talks :-) Morgan, I like your trick questions. Nice style, I’ll probably copy it to my own talks :-)

]]> By: morgan http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/10/percona-at-php-quebec-09/comment-page-1/#comment-501507 morgan Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:35:29 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=641#comment-501507 @Jason - I'll be honest, I don't have any experience with it. I'm normally more of a fan of HA solutions that provide the functionality behind MySQL, rather than as a proxy in front of it. But my rationale for this is mainly just for ease of use, since it's easier to retrofit and guarantee that all statements will still behave the same (for the same reasons the mysql statement based binlog has limitations / behaves like it does with RAND()/NOW(), etc.). You could probably group solutions like Sequoia with what I expect people will start using MySQL Proxy for as well. How do these solutions stack up? I haven't tested yet myself - nor seen much out there yet. @Jason – I’ll be honest, I don’t have any experience with it.

I’m normally more of a fan of HA solutions that provide the functionality behind MySQL, rather than as a proxy in front of it. But my rationale for this is mainly just for ease of use, since it’s easier to retrofit and guarantee that all statements will still behave the same (for the same reasons the mysql statement based binlog has limitations / behaves like it does with RAND()/NOW(), etc.).

You could probably group solutions like Sequoia with what I expect people will start using MySQL Proxy for as well. How do these solutions stack up? I haven’t tested yet myself – nor seen much out there yet.

]]> By: Jason http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/10/percona-at-php-quebec-09/comment-page-1/#comment-501497 Jason Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:17:54 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=641#comment-501497 What is your/Percona's opinion about Continuent's Sequoia for MySQL HA? http://community.continuent.com/community/sequoia I find it odd that it seems absent from most discussions of MySQL HA. It offers synchronous replication. On paper it looks pretty good - I was put off by the documentation. Wondering if you guys have ever put it through its paces. Cheers What is your/Percona’s opinion about Continuent’s Sequoia for MySQL HA?

http://community.continuent.com/community/sequoia

I find it odd that it seems absent from most discussions of MySQL HA.

It offers synchronous replication. On paper it looks pretty good – I was put off by the documentation.

Wondering if you guys have ever put it through its paces.

Cheers

]]>