<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Impossible &#8211; possible, moving InnoDB tables between servers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-742752</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-742752</guid>
		<description>Luke,

I think I got you idea, and it should be possible to implement, but it is not easy ..

You may contact us http://www.percona.com/contacts.html
for discussion how we can proceed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke,</p>
<p>I think I got you idea, and it should be possible to implement, but it is not easy ..</p>
<p>You may contact us <a href="http://www.percona.com/contacts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.percona.com/contacts.html</a><br />
for discussion how we can proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Marsden</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-738630</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Marsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-738630</guid>
		<description>Hi Vadim,

Thank you for this excellent post and some really exciting work with XtraDB.

Would there be any way to achieve the same transfer of a database from one server to another without making an explicit duplicate (backup) copy of the InnoDB data files on the first server in the process?

I&#039;m considering this in the context of a cluster of machines running XtraDB where we want to &quot;stream&quot; backups of databases from one node (A) to another (B) by using ZFS snapshots rather than query-based MySQL replication. I&#039;d be happy with a short write-block period on A during which the .ibd and .ext files are prepared *in-situ* (so we don&#039;t need to wait while we copy gigabytes of data) and then a snapshot of them is made, at which point the database can un-block and the snapshot can be transmitted to B. Then upon receipt of the snapshot B can do steps 3-7 to get a consistent backup.

I guess my question is: can XtraBackup be configured / easily patched to do its --export --prepare magic on live XtraDB files rather than a backup copy of them, on the assumption that it&#039;s okay to initiate a write lock on that database for the duration of its action? Also, could XtraDB cope with these files being modified while it&#039;s running?

I&#039;d be very interested to hear any thoughts you have on this.

Best Regards,
Luke Marsden
Hybrid Logic Ltd.

www.hybrid-cluster.com - Next-generation cloud web hosting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vadim,</p>
<p>Thank you for this excellent post and some really exciting work with XtraDB.</p>
<p>Would there be any way to achieve the same transfer of a database from one server to another without making an explicit duplicate (backup) copy of the InnoDB data files on the first server in the process?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m considering this in the context of a cluster of machines running XtraDB where we want to &#8220;stream&#8221; backups of databases from one node (A) to another (B) by using ZFS snapshots rather than query-based MySQL replication. I&#8217;d be happy with a short write-block period on A during which the .ibd and .ext files are prepared *in-situ* (so we don&#8217;t need to wait while we copy gigabytes of data) and then a snapshot of them is made, at which point the database can un-block and the snapshot can be transmitted to B. Then upon receipt of the snapshot B can do steps 3-7 to get a consistent backup.</p>
<p>I guess my question is: can XtraBackup be configured / easily patched to do its &#8211;export &#8211;prepare magic on live XtraDB files rather than a backup copy of them, on the assumption that it&#8217;s okay to initiate a write lock on that database for the duration of its action? Also, could XtraDB cope with these files being modified while it&#8217;s running?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be very interested to hear any thoughts you have on this.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Luke Marsden<br />
Hybrid Logic Ltd.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hybrid-cluster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hybrid-cluster.com</a> &#8211; Next-generation cloud web hosting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580795</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580795</guid>
		<description>Vadim,

When some feature is comming so one can do EXPORT TABLESPACE or something similar from MySQL/MariaDB directly ? 
I think this will make such feature much more useful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim,</p>
<p>When some feature is comming so one can do EXPORT TABLESPACE or something similar from MySQL/MariaDB directly ?<br />
I think this will make such feature much more useful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shahryar ghazi</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580672</link>
		<dc:creator>shahryar ghazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580672</guid>
		<description>yup, this is a great feature to have</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yup, this is a great feature to have</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580519</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580519</guid>
		<description>Billy,

Yes, it&#039;s not problem, but again it should be running XtraDB (or InnoDB with patch)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billy,</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s not problem, but again it should be running XtraDB (or InnoDB with patch)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580483</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580483</guid>
		<description>Can you copy innodb tables across schemas on the same db? 

Ex: Copy schema1.test_table to schema2.test_table</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you copy innodb tables across schemas on the same db? </p>
<p>Ex: Copy schema1.test_table to schema2.test_table</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Callaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580197</guid>
		<description>Wow! This is a great feature to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! This is a great feature to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580196</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580196</guid>
		<description>Singer,

For now XtraDB is almost fully compatible with InnoDB table format and backward. So you can import table to XtraDB and after that start InnoDB instance on database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singer,</p>
<p>For now XtraDB is almost fully compatible with InnoDB table format and backward. So you can import table to XtraDB and after that start InnoDB instance on database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Singer Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/08/impossible-possible-moving-innodb-tables-between-servers/comment-page-1/#comment-580195</link>
		<dc:creator>Singer Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=699#comment-580195</guid>
		<description>So, I&#039;m reading this. Does this mean that the eventual table it ends up as is an XtraDB table, not an InnoDB table?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;m reading this. Does this mean that the eventual table it ends up as is an XtraDB table, not an InnoDB table?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

