<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: xtrabackup-0.9.5rc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3934</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: khem</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-720973</link>
		<dc:creator>khem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-720973</guid>
		<description>agree with Nils :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree with Nils <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-684779</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-684779</guid>
		<description>Seems like there is no source tarball on the Server, only source rpm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like there is no source tarball on the Server, only source rpm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4i칩</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-677951</link>
		<dc:creator>r4i칩</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-677951</guid>
		<description>Xtrabackup:

    * Free
    * takes 1.1% longer (2 min during a 3 hour backup)
    * uses 1.4% more space (1G more in a 70G backup — this was for uncompressed backups)
    * uses 1.115% more cpu overall
    * split as 0.12% user, 0.66% nice, 0.025% system, 0.31% more iowait, 0% more steal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xtrabackup:</p>
<p>    * Free<br />
    * takes 1.1% longer (2 min during a 3 hour backup)<br />
    * uses 1.4% more space (1G more in a 70G backup — this was for uncompressed backups)<br />
    * uses 1.115% more cpu overall<br />
    * split as 0.12% user, 0.66% nice, 0.025% system, 0.31% more iowait, 0% more steal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-673613</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Callaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-673613</guid>
		<description>That is a very nice feature as I know several DBAs who really don&#039;t like to run FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK on a master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a very nice feature as I know several DBAs who really don&#8217;t like to run FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK on a master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-673610</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-673610</guid>
		<description>Mark,

We have added --no-lock option which allows to run xtrabackup without lock, and you can get binary log information from output, which is taken from InnoDB transactional log. It is safe to use if database is InnoDB-only</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>We have added &#8211;no-lock option which allows to run xtrabackup without lock, and you can get binary log information from output, which is taken from InnoDB transactional log. It is safe to use if database is InnoDB-only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-673596</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Callaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-673596</guid>
		<description>Xtrabackup and InnoDB hot backup do hot backups. A backup is hot when you can perform it on an active database. While there is a brief pause from the need to run FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK (and that pause is to be eliminated in future versions of MySQL and forks) neither of these products require activity to be stopped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xtrabackup and InnoDB hot backup do hot backups. A backup is hot when you can perform it on an active database. While there is a brief pause from the need to run FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK (and that pause is to be eliminated in future versions of MySQL and forks) neither of these products require activity to be stopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gulf</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-672737</link>
		<dc:creator>gulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-672737</guid>
		<description>Does the xtrabackup support the partition table? For example, I just want to backup one partition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the xtrabackup support the partition table? For example, I just want to backup one partition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Csfor</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-670178</link>
		<dc:creator>Csfor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-670178</guid>
		<description>The bug has just been fixed.  See http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-dev/percona-xtrabackup/trunk/revision/103 . Thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bug has just been fixed.  See <a href="http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-dev/percona-xtrabackup/trunk/revision/103" rel="nofollow">http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~percona-dev/percona-xtrabackup/trunk/revision/103</a> . Thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheeri K. Cabral (Pythian)</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-669345</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheeri K. Cabral (Pythian)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-669345</guid>
		<description>Csfor -- both InnoDB hot backup and Xtrabackup are &quot;warm&quot; backups -- they do take some resources, but even on busy servers I haven&#039;t seen crashing -- if you&#039;re having crashing, you want to adjust some of your parameters (like memory usage) so they&#039;re not right on the edge of crashing, or run the backup at a lower peak time.

There are lots of crashing bugs in older versions of MySQL, upgrading might fix your problems if you have version more than a few months old.  Pythian has clients on Percona&#039;s build of MySQL and the official MySQL builds, and we use both InnoDB Hot Backup and Xtrabackup on different clients, and we don&#039;t find crashing.

We did find similar usage for Xtrabackup vs. InnoDB hot backup - so Xtrabackup isn&#039;t causing really different loads than InnoDB hot backup.  (we found that xtrabackup consistently used 1% more resources, which isn&#039;t that big of a deal, especially considering xtrabackup is free and Innodb Hot backup is very expensive) -- the numbers are here:  http://www.pythian.com/news/4177/taste-test-innobackup-vs-xtrabackup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Csfor &#8212; both InnoDB hot backup and Xtrabackup are &#8220;warm&#8221; backups &#8212; they do take some resources, but even on busy servers I haven&#8217;t seen crashing &#8212; if you&#8217;re having crashing, you want to adjust some of your parameters (like memory usage) so they&#8217;re not right on the edge of crashing, or run the backup at a lower peak time.</p>
<p>There are lots of crashing bugs in older versions of MySQL, upgrading might fix your problems if you have version more than a few months old.  Pythian has clients on Percona&#8217;s build of MySQL and the official MySQL builds, and we use both InnoDB Hot Backup and Xtrabackup on different clients, and we don&#8217;t find crashing.</p>
<p>We did find similar usage for Xtrabackup vs. InnoDB hot backup &#8211; so Xtrabackup isn&#8217;t causing really different loads than InnoDB hot backup.  (we found that xtrabackup consistently used 1% more resources, which isn&#8217;t that big of a deal, especially considering xtrabackup is free and Innodb Hot backup is very expensive) &#8212; the numbers are here:  <a href="http://www.pythian.com/news/4177/taste-test-innobackup-vs-xtrabackup" rel="nofollow">http://www.pythian.com/news/4177/taste-test-innobackup-vs-xtrabackup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/24/xtrabackup-0-9-5rc/comment-page-1/#comment-669296</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1523#comment-669296</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barracuda file format as well as compressed tables are supported. &quot; 

Does that mean that didn&#039;t really work beforehand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Barracuda file format as well as compressed tables are supported. &#8221; </p>
<p>Does that mean that didn&#8217;t really work beforehand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
