<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5.0.87-build20 Percona binaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/5-0-87-build20-percona-binaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/5-0-87-build20-percona-binaries/</link>
	<description>Everything about MySQL Performance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:06:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7330</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Tocker</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/5-0-87-build20-percona-binaries/comment-page-1/#comment-681579</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Tocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1751#comment-681579</guid>
		<description>Geoff, Raine: We build binaries for both 5.1 and 5.0.

If you&#039;re already using 5.1 - stick to it.  The most recent 5.1 binary announce was here:
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/12/xtradb-storage-engine-release-1-0-4-8/

If you&#039;re using 5.0, it&#039;s probably time to start planning your upgrade.  Officially &#039;Active Support&#039; ends at the end of December, so you can expect less and less development focus on it:
http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/lifecycle/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, Raine: We build binaries for both 5.1 and 5.0.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re already using 5.1 &#8211; stick to it.  The most recent 5.1 binary announce was here:<br />
<a href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/12/xtradb-storage-engine-release-1-0-4-8/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/10/12/xtradb-storage-engine-release-1-0-4-8/</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re using 5.0, it&#8217;s probably time to start planning your upgrade.  Officially &#8216;Active Support&#8217; ends at the end of December, so you can expect less and less development focus on it:<br />
<a href="http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/lifecycle/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/lifecycle/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raine</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/5-0-87-build20-percona-binaries/comment-page-1/#comment-679851</link>
		<dc:creator>Raine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1751#comment-679851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m quite confused. Stable/production builds from Percona are based on MySQL 5.0.x or 5.1.x?

What build should I use on production servers?

Regards,
Raine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m quite confused. Stable/production builds from Percona are based on MySQL 5.0.x or 5.1.x?</p>
<p>What build should I use on production servers?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Raine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/5-0-87-build20-percona-binaries/comment-page-1/#comment-679604</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1751#comment-679604</guid>
		<description>Is it worth/recommended to downgrade from a non RedHat RPM 5.1.40 MySQL installation to this Percona build? Which would have better performance? MySQL for dedicated CentOS 5.4 DB server focused on performance.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it worth/recommended to downgrade from a non RedHat RPM 5.1.40 MySQL installation to this Percona build? Which would have better performance? MySQL for dedicated CentOS 5.4 DB server focused on performance.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
