<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How innodb_open_files affects performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/how-innodb_open_files-affects-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/how-innodb_open_files-affects-performance/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveJ</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/how-innodb_open_files-affects-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-747573</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1764#comment-747573</guid>
		<description>I posted a comment on http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/16/table_cache-negative-scalability/ asking about open_file_limit.

One thing I see that is not talked about is how the os ulimit of &quot;open files&quot;, mysql setting &quot;open_file_limit&quot; affects the OS/MySQL and I believe is non-biased to MyISAM and InnoDB table types.

If the max open_file_limit is 65535, does this mean a linux 64bit server could never have more than that opened at a given time?

How would you work around this and why wouldn&#039;t MySQL use LRU algorithm to close OS open&#039;ed files if the max is hit and avoid errno 24 (too many open files)?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a comment on <a href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/16/table_cache-negative-scalability/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/16/table_cache-negative-scalability/</a> asking about open_file_limit.</p>
<p>One thing I see that is not talked about is how the os ulimit of &#8220;open files&#8221;, mysql setting &#8220;open_file_limit&#8221; affects the OS/MySQL and I believe is non-biased to MyISAM and InnoDB table types.</p>
<p>If the max open_file_limit is 65535, does this mean a linux 64bit server could never have more than that opened at a given time?</p>
<p>How would you work around this and why wouldn&#8217;t MySQL use LRU algorithm to close OS open&#8217;ed files if the max is hit and avoid errno 24 (too many open files)?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiger</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/how-innodb_open_files-affects-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-689192</link>
		<dc:creator>tiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1764#comment-689192</guid>
		<description>Its wonderful and absolute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its wonderful and absolute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/how-innodb_open_files-affects-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-679899</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1764#comment-679899</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

See the previous post on this matter. If you&#039;re running into hundreds of thousands or more tables large table cache may be actually hurting you. 

We have not investigated it but I trust there is something relatively simple which gets proportionally slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>See the previous post on this matter. If you&#8217;re running into hundreds of thousands or more tables large table cache may be actually hurting you. </p>
<p>We have not investigated it but I trust there is something relatively simple which gets proportionally slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan H</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/11/18/how-innodb_open_files-affects-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-679672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1764#comment-679672</guid>
		<description>We have our table_cache set to 16384 on our server and we are running into performance issue with this setting especially on QA servers where we recreate hundreds of databases daily (with 300+ tables each) then process to recreate them get&#039;s worse and worse over time with the table cache seeming to be the primary culprit. Is this listed as a bug anywhere currently?

-Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have our table_cache set to 16384 on our server and we are running into performance issue with this setting especially on QA servers where we recreate hundreds of databases daily (with 300+ tables each) then process to recreate them get&#8217;s worse and worse over time with the table cache seeming to be the primary culprit. Is this listed as a bug anywhere currently?</p>
<p>-Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

