Comments on: FusionIO – time for benchmarks http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/ Percona's MySQL & InnoDB performance and scalability blog Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-696219 Vadim Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:58:16 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-696219 Ryan, I hope I will get 320GB MLC card soon, so I will be able to test. I got recommendation from FusionIO so I can run two cards in parallel using RAID0, and it asow will improve IO performance. I have no statistics how durable is that, so I can't comment. Ryan,

I hope I will get 320GB MLC card soon, so I will be able to test.
I got recommendation from FusionIO so I can run two cards in parallel using RAID0, and it asow
will improve IO performance.
I have no statistics how durable is that, so I can’t comment.

]]> By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-694772 Vadim Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:47:28 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-694772 David, I just noticed press-release http://www.fusionio.com/images/case-studies/zappos-case-study.pdf Zappos moved MySQL instances to IBM systems with FusionIO card, with 3x consolidation. David,

I just noticed press-release
http://www.fusionio.com/images/case-studies/zappos-case-study.pdf

Zappos moved MySQL instances to IBM systems with FusionIO card, with
3x consolidation.

]]> By: Vadim http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693913 Vadim Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:20:26 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693913 David, I think I would be OK to run it in production without mirroring, just would make sure I have reliable backup solution. FusionIO also allows to make backup quite fast. David,

I think I would be OK to run it in production without mirroring, just would make sure I
have reliable backup solution. FusionIO also allows to make backup quite fast.

]]> By: Didier Spezia http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693801 Didier Spezia Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:20:10 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693801 Interesting! Would you run just one of this card in a production server? It is supposed to be more reliable than a hard drive, but is it reliable enough to avoid the cost of buying a second card for mirroring purpose? Interesting! Would you run just one of this card in a production server? It is supposed to be more reliable than a hard drive, but is it reliable enough to avoid the cost of buying a second card for mirroring purpose?

]]> By: peter http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693444 peter Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:19:38 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693444 Steven, We tent to test hardware we get out hands on. If you can have someone on OCZ to send us one we'd be happy to test it. Steven,

We tent to test hardware we get out hands on. If you can have someone on OCZ to send us one we’d be happy to test it.

]]> By: Steven Roussey http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693412 Steven Roussey Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:24:43 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693412 Would be interesting to compare with OCZ integrated RAID/SSD solutions (both the PCI-E cards and the 3.5" Colossus, though the latter really needs to be on SATA III). Would be interesting to compare with OCZ integrated RAID/SSD solutions (both the PCI-E cards and the 3.5″ Colossus, though the latter really needs to be on SATA III).

]]> By: Dan Rogart http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693210 Dan Rogart Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:59:42 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693210 Interesting results. Do you have a graph for sequential write speeds on the RAID device? Would be nice to compare side by side with the Fusion IO graph for that test. Thanks! Interesting results. Do you have a graph for sequential write speeds on the RAID device? Would be nice to compare side by side with the Fusion IO graph for that test.

Thanks!

]]> By: Ryan H http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693145 Ryan H Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:23:45 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693145 If we need at least 600GB per server any thoughts to the using the larger MLC cards vs RAIDing multiple cards together. Also any thoughts on if RAID is used how it should be configured and if if this impacts durability in any way. If we need at least 600GB per server any thoughts to the using the larger MLC cards vs RAIDing multiple cards together. Also any thoughts on if RAID is used how it should be configured and if if this impacts durability in any way.

]]> By: uxio http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-693006 uxio Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:10:29 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-693006 I have the same card in production. My priority was IO/s and is amazing solution. Practically disapears the io-wait. I saw 95000 io/s on a 4k sysbench rndrd with reiserfs. I have the same card in production. My priority was IO/s and is amazing solution. Practically disapears the io-wait. I saw 95000 io/s on a 4k sysbench rndrd with reiserfs.

]]> By: aaron kempf http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/12/08/fusionio-time-for-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-805910 aaron kempf Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:00:01 +0000 http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=1841#comment-805910 <div class="item-body"><p>you don’t need 4 threads.. you just need a database that supports SMP dude.</p> <div class="clear"></div></div>

you don’t need 4 threads.. you just need a database that supports SMP dude.

]]>