<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast storage: 8 SSD Intel X-25M 80GB benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain Draet</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-875600</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain Draet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-875600</guid>
		<description>Hi vadim,

thanks for putting ou those test.
I was wondering though. Do you consider the performance of SSD drive with Mysql better than regular HDD?
(seems like a too basic question may be, sorry :-)

Thanks a lot

Alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi vadim,</p>
<p>thanks for putting ou those test.<br />
I was wondering though. Do you consider the performance of SSD drive with Mysql better than regular HDD?<br />
(seems like a too basic question may be, sorry <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks a lot</p>
<p>Alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos van Dongen</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-717549</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos van Dongen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-717549</guid>
		<description>For those interested, I ran into another X-25M vs FusionIO benchmark: http://hothardware.com/Articles/Fusionio-vs-Intel-X25M-SSD-RAID-Grudge-Match/?page=1

best, Jos</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested, I ran into another X-25M vs FusionIO benchmark: <a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Fusionio-vs-Intel-X25M-SSD-RAID-Grudge-Match/?page=1" rel="nofollow">http://hothardware.com/Articles/Fusionio-vs-Intel-X25M-SSD-RAID-Grudge-Match/?page=1</a></p>
<p>best, Jos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-715467</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-715467</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to try this setup under FreeBSD 8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to try this setup under FreeBSD 8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-712774</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-712774</guid>
		<description>The reason sequential writes stunk was --file-extra-flags=direct.  Rerun the benchmarks without it and you&#039;ll see much better performance (257MB/sec across a 22 drive 25-M raid-10 array, here -- not great, but decent).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason sequential writes stunk was &#8211;file-extra-flags=direct.  Rerun the benchmarks without it and you&#8217;ll see much better performance (257MB/sec across a 22 drive 25-M raid-10 array, here &#8212; not great, but decent).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-712470</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-712470</guid>
		<description>Vlad,

If look on SSD (and recent FusionIO benchmarks), they usually do not like sequential writes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad,</p>
<p>If look on SSD (and recent FusionIO benchmarks), they usually do not like sequential writes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad Rodionov</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-712465</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Rodionov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-712465</guid>
		<description>How come sequential writes slower than random ones? Even single X-25M can do 80MB per sec. Something is wrong with your setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come sequential writes slower than random ones? Even single X-25M can do 80MB per sec. Something is wrong with your setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vojtech Kurka</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-712032</link>
		<dc:creator>Vojtech Kurka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-712032</guid>
		<description>Vadim, thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim, thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-712031</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-712031</guid>
		<description>Vojtech,

Intel SSDs was used with enabled write cache, that is not in durable mode.

FusionIO says it works in durable mode by default in latest drivers (which I use).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vojtech,</p>
<p>Intel SSDs was used with enabled write cache, that is not in durable mode.</p>
<p>FusionIO says it works in durable mode by default in latest drivers (which I use).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vojtech</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-711883</link>
		<dc:creator>Vojtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-711883</guid>
		<description>Vadim,

did you use the drives and FusionIO in durable mode? I mean this:

http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/15/testing-fusionio-strict_sync-is-too-strict/

I&#039;m sorry if I overlooked it, but I can&#039;t find any note concerning this in the test results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim,</p>
<p>did you use the drives and FusionIO in durable mode? I mean this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/15/testing-fusionio-strict_sync-is-too-strict/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/15/testing-fusionio-strict_sync-is-too-strict/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if I overlooked it, but I can&#8217;t find any note concerning this in the test results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vojtech Kurka</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/01/18/fast-storage-8-ssd-intel-x-25m-80gb-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-711873</link>
		<dc:creator>Vojtech Kurka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2077#comment-711873</guid>
		<description>Vadim,

did you use the drives and FusionIO in durable mode? I mean this:

http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/15/testing-fusionio-strict_sync-is-too-strict/

I&#039;m sorry if I overlooked it, but I can&#039;t find any note concerning this in the test results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim,</p>
<p>did you use the drives and FusionIO in durable mode? I mean this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/03/02/ssd-xfs-lvm-fsync-write-cache-barrier-and-lost-transactions/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/15/testing-fusionio-strict_sync-is-too-strict/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/06/15/testing-fusionio-strict_sync-is-too-strict/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry if I overlooked it, but I can&#8217;t find any note concerning this in the test results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

