<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InnoDB TABLE/INDEX stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-739100</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2333#comment-739100</guid>
		<description>Emily,

For now it is only in Percona-XtraDB, but it is not exclusive.
Everyone, including core, can implement it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily,</p>
<p>For now it is only in Percona-XtraDB, but it is not exclusive.<br />
Everyone, including core, can implement it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-739099</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2333#comment-739099</guid>
		<description>Is this coming to core, or is it exclusively percona?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this coming to core, or is it exclusively percona?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-738909</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2333#comment-738909</guid>
		<description>Arjen, Shlomi,

What we show there is already available information in InnoDB data dictionary.
What you ask needs some additional changes in InnoDB data dict, which may be not easy to
archive (may break compatibility with current data dict), but it is hard to say, I did  not look into yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arjen, Shlomi,</p>
<p>What we show there is already available information in InnoDB data dictionary.<br />
What you ask needs some additional changes in InnoDB data dict, which may be not easy to<br />
archive (may break compatibility with current data dict), but it is hard to say, I did  not look into yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shlomi Noach</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-738858</link>
		<dc:creator>Shlomi Noach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2333#comment-738858</guid>
		<description>Would you add &quot;index_depth&quot; column for indexes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you add &#8220;index_depth&#8221; column for indexes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arjen Lentz</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/03/20/innodb-tableindex-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-738788</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjen Lentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2333#comment-738788</guid>
		<description>For both, can you add a column counting access?
This could then easily replace the server based table/index statistics and possibly in a more efficient manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For both, can you add a column counting access?<br />
This could then easily replace the server based table/index statistics and possibly in a more efficient manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

