<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL 5.5.4 in tpcc-like workload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sac a main pas cher</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-807373</link>
		<dc:creator>Sac a main pas cher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-807373</guid>
		<description>Vadim, any idea what is going on with the ioc500 graph in Percona Server in the graphs linked from your comment #14 above?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim, any idea what is going on with the ioc500 graph in Percona Server in the graphs linked from your comment #14 above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angel</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-804320</link>
		<dc:creator>angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-804320</guid>
		<description>Je l&#039;aime beaucoup, Merci pour le partage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Je l&#8217;aime beaucoup, Merci pour le partage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-761604</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 01:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-761604</guid>
		<description>Dimitri,

I posted results with &lt;code&gt;innodb_io_capacity=500 and 2000&lt;/code&gt; for MySQL 5.5.4.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_for_bp_24gb_mysql_554&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_for_bp_24gb_mysql_554
&lt;/a&gt;

So when data fits into memory ( buffer_pool=24Gb), it seems innodb_io_capacity=2000 will help to avoid periodical drops in MySQL 5.5.4.

It does not help though when buffer_pool is smaller than dataset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dimitri,</p>
<p>I posted results with <code>innodb_io_capacity=500 and 2000</code> for MySQL 5.5.4.<br />
<a href="http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_for_bp_24gb_mysql_554" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_for_bp_24gb_mysql_554" rel="nofollow">http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_for_bp_24gb_mysql_554</a></p>
<p>So when data fits into memory ( buffer_pool=24Gb), it seems innodb_io_capacity=2000 will help to avoid periodical drops in MySQL 5.5.4.</p>
<p>It does not help though when buffer_pool is smaller than dataset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752781</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 17:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752781</guid>
		<description>@Peter - I think the solution with IO capacity will be still more light than any other..  as well extremely simple and easily applicable ;-) Specially with all incoming SSD base solutions we&#039;ll save a huge amount of CPU cycles.. But well - it&#039;s my opinion, and I&#039;m not ready to change it until you don&#039;t present me another working solution ;-)

@Vadim - Agree to connect to your server and try to analyze together - let&#039;s get in contact on Monday (by mail or skype) - I&#039;ll also need another Linux host/PC to setup dim_STAT and fully monitor your workload.. (let&#039;s get it off-list)

I&#039;m very curious to understand what&#039;s going wrong here..

Rgds,
-Dimitri</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter &#8211; I think the solution with IO capacity will be still more light than any other..  as well extremely simple and easily applicable <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Specially with all incoming SSD base solutions we&#8217;ll save a huge amount of CPU cycles.. But well &#8211; it&#8217;s my opinion, and I&#8217;m not ready to change it until you don&#8217;t present me another working solution <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Vadim &#8211; Agree to connect to your server and try to analyze together &#8211; let&#8217;s get in contact on Monday (by mail or skype) &#8211; I&#8217;ll also need another Linux host/PC to setup dim_STAT and fully monitor your workload.. (let&#8217;s get it off-list)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very curious to understand what&#8217;s going wrong here..</p>
<p>Rgds,<br />
-Dimitri</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752749</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752749</guid>
		<description>Baron,

No :( I do not have clear explanation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baron,</p>
<p>No <img src='http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  I do not have clear explanation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baron Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752682</link>
		<dc:creator>Baron Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752682</guid>
		<description>Vadim, any idea what is going on with the ioc500 graph in Percona Server in the graphs linked from your comment #14 above?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vadim, any idea what is going on with the ioc500 graph in Percona Server in the graphs linked from your comment #14 above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752537</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 04:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752537</guid>
		<description>pingshan,

For 5.0 we have Percona-Server-5.0 which shows comparable performance with XtraDB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pingshan,</p>
<p>For 5.0 we have Percona-Server-5.0 which shows comparable performance with XtraDB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pingshan</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752518</link>
		<dc:creator>pingshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752518</guid>
		<description>I am still using MySQL5.0.x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still using MySQL5.0.x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752321</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 23:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752321</guid>
		<description>Dimitri,

I posted graphs with different io_capacity for 10GB buffer_pool here:
http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_variations

we may find that io_capacity=1000 is somewhat better, but not dramatically.

You are pretty much welcome to repeat results on my box with FusionIO cards, I can give you access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dimitri,</p>
<p>I posted graphs with different io_capacity for 10GB buffer_pool here:<br />
<a href="http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_variations" rel="nofollow">http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/benchmark:mysql:554-tpcc:start#io_capacity_variations</a></p>
<p>we may find that io_capacity=1000 is somewhat better, but not dramatically.</p>
<p>You are pretty much welcome to repeat results on my box with FusionIO cards, I can give you access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vadim</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/04/21/mysql-5-5-4-in-tpcc-like-workload/comment-page-1/#comment-752126</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 15:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2510#comment-752126</guid>
		<description>Peter,

asynchronous IO is &quot;on&quot; by default in 5.5.4 so I tested with it.

Also I used &quot;fast_cheksums&quot; in XtraDB, but I see it does not affect results so much (couple percents)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,</p>
<p>asynchronous IO is &#8220;on&#8221; by default in 5.5.4 so I tested with it.</p>
<p>Also I used &#8220;fast_cheksums&#8221; in XtraDB, but I see it does not affect results so much (couple percents)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

