<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuning InnoDB Concurrency Tickets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/05/24/tuning-innodb-concurrency-tickets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/05/24/tuning-innodb-concurrency-tickets/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/05/24/tuning-innodb-concurrency-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-765611</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 05:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2728#comment-765611</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

I am not sure I understand why higher innodb_concurrency tickets will reduce  throughput ?  For me it looks opposite - the higher value will allow less &quot;interruptions&quot; while running queries and less overhead while checking concurrency. It will however increase variance - the larger is the value there is a longer period the query can starve for.

The trick is as thread is considered &quot;inside innodb&quot;  when it is doing IO as well as when it is processing data in memory, so the time to which given number of tickets correspond can vary. 
500 tickets may amount to  less than ms if small rows are accessed in memory or more than as second if accessing all rows requires physical disk IO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>I am not sure I understand why higher innodb_concurrency tickets will reduce  throughput ?  For me it looks opposite &#8211; the higher value will allow less &#8220;interruptions&#8221; while running queries and less overhead while checking concurrency. It will however increase variance &#8211; the larger is the value there is a longer period the query can starve for.</p>
<p>The trick is as thread is considered &#8220;inside innodb&#8221;  when it is doing IO as well as when it is processing data in memory, so the time to which given number of tickets correspond can vary.<br />
500 tickets may amount to  less than ms if small rows are accessed in memory or more than as second if accessing all rows requires physical disk IO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Bester</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/05/24/tuning-innodb-concurrency-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-765558</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Bester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2728#comment-765558</guid>
		<description>should be worth noting that &quot;show engine innodb status&quot; does show some limited info:

---TRANSACTION 0 58505, COMMITTED IN MEMORY, process no 1366, OS thread id 68725056 committing, thread declared inside InnoDB 17

That 17 is number of trx-&gt;n_tickets_to_enter_innodb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should be worth noting that &#8220;show engine innodb status&#8221; does show some limited info:</p>
<p>&#8212;TRANSACTION 0 58505, COMMITTED IN MEMORY, process no 1366, OS thread id 68725056 committing, thread declared inside InnoDB 17</p>
<p>That 17 is number of trx-&gt;n_tickets_to_enter_innodb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webinar: Introduction to Percona Server, XtraDB and Xtrabackup &#124; MySQL Performance Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/05/24/tuning-innodb-concurrency-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-805898</link>
		<dc:creator>Webinar: Introduction to Percona Server, XtraDB and Xtrabackup &#124; MySQL Performance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2728#comment-805898</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;item-body&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;[...] will be a technical talk, but perhaps less technical than some of our other posts. I recommend inviting a few friends &amp; colleagues that are already familiar with MySQL, but [...]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="item-body">
<p>[...] will be a technical talk, but perhaps less technical than some of our other posts. I recommend inviting a few friends &amp; colleagues that are already familiar with MySQL, but [...]</p>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nilesh</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/05/24/tuning-innodb-concurrency-tickets/comment-page-1/#comment-806297</link>
		<dc:creator>Nilesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=2728#comment-806297</guid>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;item-body&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;how to check that   &gt; maximum number of concurrent threads that the InnoDB plug-in can create&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;clear&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="item-body">
<p>how to check that   &gt; maximum number of concurrent threads that the InnoDB plug-in can create</p>
<div class="clear"></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

