<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scaling: Consider both Size and Load</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/</link>
	<description>Percona&#039;s MySQL &#38; InnoDB performance and scalability blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/comment-page-1/#comment-769324</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=3344#comment-769324</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sergey.

Fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sergey.</p>
<p>Fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/comment-page-1/#comment-769321</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=3344#comment-769321</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Typo:
&quot;As your data growths you may frequently find load becoming CPU bound&quot;
- should be &quot;disk I/O bound&quot; or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Typo:<br />
&#8220;As your data growths you may frequently find load becoming CPU bound&#8221;<br />
- should be &#8220;disk I/O bound&#8221; or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/comment-page-1/#comment-769320</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=3344#comment-769320</guid>
		<description>Jestep,

Indeed. Operations add a whole different angle which I have not covered.  Certain operations task such as Alter Table become especially bad, not only they may not fit in the &quot;downtime window&quot; allowed by some businesses but they their speed is often disproportionally reduced as data size grows due to less memory fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jestep,</p>
<p>Indeed. Operations add a whole different angle which I have not covered.  Certain operations task such as Alter Table become especially bad, not only they may not fit in the &#8220;downtime window&#8221; allowed by some businesses but they their speed is often disproportionally reduced as data size grows due to less memory fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Angel</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/comment-page-1/#comment-769292</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 06:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=3344#comment-769292</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I am creating a software program using MySQL? 

Where do I host my MySQL database? 
What systems do you recommend for placing and operating my database program?

Thank you.
Sarah Angel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am creating a software program using MySQL? </p>
<p>Where do I host my MySQL database?<br />
What systems do you recommend for placing and operating my database program?</p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Sarah Angel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jestep</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2010/07/13/scaling-consider-both-size-and-load/comment-page-1/#comment-769282</link>
		<dc:creator>Jestep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?p=3344#comment-769282</guid>
		<description>One thing not to forget is sheer administration. When your DB is tapped out on resources, an alter table, modifying an index, or even a rarely used query creates prohibiting response times for completion. These can create simply unacceptable delays when trying to properly administer or restore a DB. In my experience administration suffers far before user or application interaction. While I don&#039;t have the magic formula for database resources-to-size, when administering the db becomes ridiculous, planned usage is close to follow. I would say if you ever have to scale, scale to the point that you don&#039;t think you will ever need it (cost allowing of course). Most likely you&#039;ll still find that you didn&#039;t do enough in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing not to forget is sheer administration. When your DB is tapped out on resources, an alter table, modifying an index, or even a rarely used query creates prohibiting response times for completion. These can create simply unacceptable delays when trying to properly administer or restore a DB. In my experience administration suffers far before user or application interaction. While I don&#8217;t have the magic formula for database resources-to-size, when administering the db becomes ridiculous, planned usage is close to follow. I would say if you ever have to scale, scale to the point that you don&#8217;t think you will ever need it (cost allowing of course). Most likely you&#8217;ll still find that you didn&#8217;t do enough in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

