…here: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/files/benchmarks/innodb-myisam-falcon.html (Note: This benchmark is synthetic micro benchmarks focusing on particular simple data … Falcon is the best, because Falcon uses a tricky technic to retrieve rows (more details with Jim Starkey’s comments in Part 2…
Post: PBXT benchmarks
April 8, 2007 By 14 Comments
… to benchmark it in different workloads. This time I tested only READ queries, similar to ones in benchmark InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon (http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1) The… model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2210 stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 1800.163 cache size : 1024 KB 4GB of…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
January 8, 2008 By 117 Comments
Very interesting benchmark. Anyway, when will the InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 2 availabe ? I’m very curious to see the progress after 1 year from part 1.
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
January 9, 2007 By 117 Comments
…InnoDB vs. MyISAM vs. Falcon in MySQL MySQL Performance Blog — InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks. Great test and lots of figures and graphs. It highlights two things. (1) Falcon is far from being… (2) MyISAM toasts InnoDB in read performance is a myth. InnoDB rules for now with low concurrency. Eagerly waiting for part II…
Post: Paul McCullagh answers your questions about PBXT
November 20, 2009 By 2 Comments
…, and do you have any recent benchmarks available? This is no longer necessarily … Now PBXT does acquire locks for 2 reasons: to support SELECT FOR UPDATE,… of the main differences in the Falcon storage engine. PBXT supports row-level… been able to avoid modifying any part of MySQL to make the engine …
