Now as new MySQL Storage engine – Falcon is public I can write down my thought about its design, which I previously should have… – if you design new applications which are done specially for Falcon you might find those aspects positive. [-] No Spinlocks Falcon does not use… data reads Unlike other storage engines which will read row data as they traverse the index Falcon can optimize it by reading…
Post: Countless storage engines
May 3, 2007 By 6 Comments
… to OS. The developers promise to fix it soon. Falcon The Storage Engine which is developed in MySQL. The performance we see…. Also this engine will not support index coverage optimization, that makes Falcon less attractive from performance reasons. Solid The engine with both pessimistic… and read-only engine designed for DataWarehouse applications with compression rate from 10:1 to 30:1 ScaleDB The engine based on special…
Comment: Falcon Storage Engine Design Review
January 12, 2007 By 19 Comments
… be allocated to Falcon. The other is that the designer didn’t know what he was doing. I actively avoid designs that require… MVCC imposes different behaviors with regard to update conflicts. Falcon was designed to support the possibility that I could be convinced that… separate storage segment. The huge different from other storage engines that Falcon doesn’t materialize blobs unless the blob is referenced and…
Post: Paul McCullagh answers your questions about PBXT
November 20, 2009 By 2 Comments
… try it”. PBXT is a general purpose transactional storage engine, designed to perform well on a broad range of tasks, much… using MVCC is one of the main differences in the Falcon storage engine. PBXT supports row-level locking and foreign keys. Does… have very few configuration parameters.  Was this an intentional design decision, and do you see it creating opportunities for you…
Post: Power of MySQL Storage Engines
March 5, 2007 By 3 Comments
… create their own storage engines and we can see solutions as Solid and PBXT . Plus there is Falcon storage engine being developed inside MySQL. All of these storage engines are however similar in their features… I think happens with custom storage engines which are not designed to be run as core storage engines and are not match of…
Comment: Falcon Storage Engine Design Review
January 12, 2007 By 19 Comments
[...] PS：在 Falcon Storage Engine Design Review 這篇有些 Falcon è¨è¨ˆä¸Šçš„解釋，也許å¯ä»¥ç¨å¾®è§£é‡‹ç‚ºç”šéº¼ Falcon 跑起來這麼慢… [...]
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
September 6, 2007 By 117 Comments
[...] and commentary available from MySQL Performance Blog at InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 1 and Falcon Storage Engine Design [...]
Comment: Falcon Storage Engine Design Review
January 13, 2007 By 19 Comments
[...] MySQL Performance Blog » Falcon Storage Engine Design Review (tags: Tech Database MySQL Falcon Guide) [...]
Post: UC2007 Presentation and Notes
May 2, 2007 By 5 Comments
… was “Storage Engines” – There were talks about PBXT, Falcon, Innodb, NDB, Solid, NitroDB, ScaleDB as well as related to storage engine design. As usually… to use some parts of special DB2 as MySQL storage engine. I was not following it too much as it relates…
Comment: Falcon Storage Engine Design Review
January 13, 2007 By 19 Comments
[...] Falcon Storage Engine Design Review (tags: MySQL) [...]
