… page itself which could be implemented less efficiently. Regarding why Falcon can’t only read data from Index as I understand…. 1) Falcon stores collation values in the index not the data itself which means it is not always to perform reverse conversion and get real data from the index. 2) Falcon index structure is rather minimal…
Post: Countless storage engines
May 3, 2007 By 6 Comments
… PBXT do not perform fsync() after commit and fully rely to OS. The developers promise to fix it soon. Falcon The Storage Engine which is developed in MySQL. The performance we see in our previous benchmarks… engine will not support index coverage optimization, that makes Falcon less attractive from performance reasons. Solid The engine with both pessimistic and…
Post: PBXT benchmarks
April 8, 2007 By 14 Comments
… queries, similar to ones in benchmark InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon (http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam… reach InnoDB results, but I hope PBXT team will improve performance to make the difference a bit better. Unfortunately InnoDB shows… Oracle plans about. It is also interesting to check PBXT performance on INSERT/UPDATE queries taking into account PBXT way to…
Post: MySQL Northern European Customer Conference
October 17, 2007 By 7 Comments
… or just default storage engine will switch from MyISAM to Falcon. It was rather interesting to hear a lot about features… were publicly announced before. Somewhere in 6.x series proper performance monitoring instrumentation and semi-synchronous replication is promised together with… later in the conference Anders and David barely mentioned it. Performance Tuning Presentations – I’ve visited two of these, one by…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
September 11, 2009 By 117 Comments
[...] InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 1 | MySQL Performance Blog (tags: performance innodb falcon mysql scalability) [...]
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
January 19, 2008 By 117 Comments
[...] to use InnoDB, the best reason is the performance difference. I was reading an article by the MySQL Performance Blog which compared MyISAM, InnoDB and Falcon. First of all, I have never heard of Falcon, so I [...]
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
April 30, 2009 By 117 Comments
[...] MySQL avait choisi Falcon, une autre technologie en vue de la sortie de la version 6. En terme de performances, Falcon est encore très loin de rivaliser avec InnoDB.Sur Java, Mark Shuttleworth ne croit pas [...]
Comment: Monty unviels Maria and starts Blogging
January 29, 2008 By 4 Comments
…. I understand the reasoning for not wanting to distract from Falcon, because I’m a little confused. In his announcement, Monty… environments and default usage. Whereas Falcon‘s goals mention things like increased memory utilization and greater multiprocessor performance. Is that an accurate…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
September 6, 2007 By 117 Comments
[...] and commentary available from MySQL Performance Blog at InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 1 and Falcon Storage Engine Design [...]
Comment: Falcon Storage Engine Design Review
January 13, 2007 By 19 Comments
[...] MySQL Performance Blog » Falcon Storage Engine Design Review (tags: Tech Database MySQL Falcon Guide) [...]
