…Falcon is the best, because Falcon uses a tricky technic to retrieve rows (more details with Jim Starkey’s comments in Part 2). There MyISAM…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
January 8, 2008 By 117 Comments
Very interesting benchmark. Anyway, when will the InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 2 availabe ? I’m very curious to see the progress after 1 year from part 1.
Post: PBXT benchmarks
April 8, 2007 By 14 Comments
… to ones in benchmark InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon (http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1) The difference is… model name : Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2210 stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 1800.163 cache size : 1024 KB 4GB of… for MyISAM / InnoDB and pbxt-0.9.85-beta.tar.gz Compilation parameters: For MyISAM / InnoDB ./configure –prefix=/usr/local/mysqltest/mysql- –with-innodb Method…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
January 9, 2007 By 117 Comments
…InnoDB vs. MyISAM vs. Falcon in MySQL MySQL Performance Blog — InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks. Great test and lots of figures and graphs. It … of work (2) MyISAM toasts InnoDB in read performance is a myth. InnoDB rules for now with low concurrency. Eagerly waiting for part II. Tagged…
Post: Paul McCullagh answers your questions about PBXT
November 20, 2009 By 2 Comments
…MyISAM-like” to more InnoDB-like. Originally PBXT was conceived as an engine that would be somewhere between MyISAM and InnoDB… (equivalent to innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=2). A …the main differences in the Falcon storage engine. PBXT supports … able to avoid modifying any part of MySQL to make the…
