… performs in comparison to InnoDB and MyISAM. The second goal of benchmark was a popular myth that MyISAM is faster than InnoDB in reads, as InnoDB… see bad performance. We hope the performance of LIMIT queries will be fixed before release. MyISAM shows stable result. InnoDB is better than MyISAM by…
Comment: High-Performance Click Analysis with MySQL
December 23, 2008 By 13 Comments
… data compact. 4) MyISAM vs Innodb – if you have read only data you can often get data clustering with MyISAM too by ALTER TABLE … ORDER BY X. It is not same as with Innodb (data is never… for your prevailing access type. Innodb is indeed good as default but tradeoff between space and performance can be important for some…
Post: Innodb performance gotcha w Larger queries.
August 28, 2009 By 7 Comments
… is something nasty going on on Innodb level, so I tried running the test with MyISAM tables instead. The process completed in… 1000 rows in a batch vs 40 seconds for single row statements. So with single statement MyISAM was about 10% faster, which… may be kind of performance bug of 5.0. At row0sel.c:row_search_for_mysql() “PHASE 3:”, InnoDB judge whether the…
Comment: Quick look at Ubuntu 6.06
June 13, 2006 By 3 Comments
…’s that colud be? /* original idea was to check the performance of myisam vs innodb 
/*
Post: PBXT benchmarks
April 8, 2007 By 14 Comments
…queries, similar to ones in benchmark InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon (http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1) The …to reach InnoDB results, but I hope PBXT team will improve performance to make the difference a bit better. Unfortunately InnoDB shows …
Post: Enum Fields VS Varchar VS Int + Joined table: What is Faster?
January 24, 2008 By 27 Comments
… – This is MyISAM table which is accessed via index, which means to retrieve each row MySQL will have to perform OS system… often would be larger. It is also interesting to note performance of Innodb tables in this case: for VARCHAR it takes about… times faster than for MyISAM. This is great example of the case when Innodb is much faster than MyISAM for Read load. The…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
January 9, 2007 By 117 Comments
…InnoDB vs. MyISAM vs. Falcon in MySQL MySQL Performance Blog — InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks. Great test and lots of figures and graphs. … impressive after 11 months of work (2) MyISAM toasts InnoDB in read performance is a myth. InnoDB rules for now with low concurrency. Eagerly…
Comment: InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks - part 1
December 22, 2007 By 117 Comments
[...] InnoDB vs MyISAM vs Falcon benchmarks – part 1 Several days ago MySQL AB made new storage engine Falcon available for wide auditory. We cannot miss this event and executed several benchmarks to see how Falcon performs in comparison to InnoDB and MyISAM. [...]
Post: How many partitions can you have ?
December 5, 2009 By 18 Comments
… partitions 52, 100 partitions 72, 1000 partitions 290 seconds. The performance loss with large number of partitions is about 6 times…. Both MyISAM and Innodb are affected by this issue. The Update path for MyISAM without indexes took 10 seconds for 1 partition vs 52… for future use may cost you. From this benchmarks the performance remains reasonable with about 100 partitions (which is reasonable number…
Post: MySQL Replication vs DRBD Battles
April 28, 2008 By 12 Comments
… got to pick either long recovery time or further degraded performance. In the large databases I run in production relaying on… storage engines you’re using – DRBD does not work with MyISAM (check required) so you need to have processes to ensure…. First – hot vs cold. If you’re using decent hardware and care about performance you use O_DIRECT with Innodb which makes it…
