June 20, 2013

Post: Watch out for Marketing benchmarks

… a look at MySQL 5.0 Benchmarks Whitepaper and guess which type is this ? You can also compare it to my MySQL Performance 5.0 vs 4.1 presentation to have some fun. What can we see ? Out of all MySQL 4.1 vs 5.0 benchmarks which were done only benchmarks which show MySQL 5.0

Post: Enum Fields VS Varchar VS Int + Joined table: What is Faster?

… KEY state_id (state_id) ) ENGINE=MyISAM; 4) Dictionary table for cities_join: … VARCHAR show close performance, while join performance degraded dramatically. Here is why: mysql> explain select…1) Results for ENUM: select SQL_NO_CACHE city, state from cities_enum limit 10000, 5; Result time(mean): 0

Post: PBXT benchmarks

vs MyISAM vs Falcon (http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2007/01/08/innodb-vs-myisam-vs-falcon-benchmarks-part-1) …of RAM MySQL version We used MySQL 5.1.16-beta sources for MyISAM / InnoDB and pbxt-0.9.85-…query for 1, 4, 16, 64, 128, 256, 512 concurrent threads. 3. For each thread perform a warm-up…

Post: Join Optimizations in MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5

5.5 Hash Join Disabled w/ join_buffer_size=4M & mrr_buffer_size=4M Created_tmp_disk_tables 0 0 0 0 0 0 Created_tmp_tables 1 1 1 1 1 1performance gain. This is not entirely visible in the manual either for MariaDB or MySQL

Post: Multi Column indexes vs Index Merge

4,4 | NULL | 1032 | Using intersect(i1,i2); Using where | +—-+————-+———+————-+—————+——-+———+——+——+————————————-+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) As you can see in this case MySQL… about 5performance but it is far from performance

Post: Heikki Tuuri answers to Innodb questions, Part II

… at 4.1.14 because of all the bad things I’ve heard about loss of performance with 5.0.X. I’m hopeful that 5.1.X will be better, but still not sure. HT: 5.0.xx, where xx >= 30 should be better than 4.1.xx. PZ: I should note MySQL 5.0 vs 4.1 has a lot of performance differences and…

Post: Test Drive of Solid

MySQL. While my far goal is the performance1 | Mysql | | 2 | Solid | | 3 | MyISAM | | 4 | HEAP | begin; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) Session2: mysql> begin; Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec) mysql

Post: Goal driven performance optimization

performance_log_081221 where page_type=’search’ and wtime>1; +———-+—————–+——————+——————+——————+——————+ | count(*) | avg(wtime) | cpu_ratio | mysql

Post: How much overhead DRDB could cause ?

…log_at_trx_commit=1 and sync_binlog=1 you will have 4 “sync” operations in MySQL 5.0 – there is event…5.1 to date. So this is the access pattern which is often going to define your MySQL on DRBD Performance…network IO we’re speaking about 300 microseconds vs 5000 microseconds and DRBD overhead can be …

Post: MySQL 5.6.7-RC in tpcc-mysql benchmark

MySQL 5.6.7 performs Hardware specification Server: Dell PowerEdge R710 CPU: 2x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0…_pool, innodb_buffer_pool_instances=1 is more preferable. The … there it is with 2x4GB vs 2x8GB innodb logfiles. Obviously …_size = 0 query_cache_type = 0 ft_min_word_len = 4 thread_stack = …