… more point to consider. Starting the MySQL 5.1 + InnoDB-plugin and later MySQL 5.5 (or equally Percona Server 5.1 and 5.5), InnoDB uses “asynchronous” IO in Linux. Let’s test “async” mode in sysbench, and now we can get: ext4 4… xfs 4 threads: 97 MiB/sec It corresponds to results I see running MySQL benchmarks (to be published later) on ext4 vs xfs…
Post: Join Optimizations in MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5
…MySQL 5.6 becomes approximately equal to that of MySQL 5.5. MariaDB 5.5 is quite slow as compared to both MySQL 5.5 and MySQL 5.6. For MariaDB 5.5…1 1 1 1 1 1 Sort_scan 1 1 1 1 1 1…vs 5G. However, there is one number in MariaDB 5.5 that is quite large as compared to MySQL 5…
Post: Index Condition Pushdown in MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5 and its performance impact
… preparation for the talk comparing the optimizer enhancements in MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5. We are taking a look at and benchmarking… Index Condition Pushdown (ICP). Its available in both MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5 Now let’s take a look briefly at what… WHERE condition defined as: l_partkey = x and l_quantity >= 1 and l_quantity = 1 and l_quantity
Post: MySQL 6.0 vs 5.1 in TPC-H queries
… with queries from TPC-H benchmarks, particularly comparing MySQL 6.0.4-alpha with 5.1. MySQL 6.0 is interesting here, as there is… 5.1 and 6.0 in cold mode (I dropped OS caches by `echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches` and restarting mysqld) 5.1 – time 1 hour 14 min 36.90 sec 6.0 – time 1 hour…
Post: MySQL versions shootout
… overhead. Profiling MySQL 5.0 vs MySQL 4.1 couple years ago, I have seen biggest performance hit comes from query parser. In MySQL 5.0 grammar became… results, in tps (more is better) threads MySQL 4.1 MySQL 5.0 MySQL 5.1 MySQL 5.1+InnoDB-plugin MySQL 5.5 MySQL 5.6.2 1 685.52 639.73 596.01 593.51…
Post: TPC-H Run on MySQL 5.1 and 6.0
… MySQL 5.1.23 vs 6.0.4 results for 10GB data set which “fits in memory”. The cut-off time for this test was 1… by MySQL 5.1 time so if it is less than 1 MySQL 6.0 is faster if more than 1 slower: Query MySQL 5.0.23 MySQL 6… about it in his MySQL 5.1 vs 6.0 in TPC-H Queries post As a Summary: We can see MySQL capabilities to run…
Post: Identifying the load with the help of pt-query-digest and Percona Server
… atomically, not just for new connections as in MySQL. This is very helpful for measurement as otherwise …, the number of tmp tables created in memory vs on-disk, percentage of queries that needed full scan….1160 1.4% 5 0.0232 1.00 0.00 SELECT film # 9 0xCFC0642B5BBD9AC7 0.0987 1.2% 50 0.0020 1….
Post: Modeling MySQL Capacity by Measuring Resource Consumptions
…MySQL process: root@ubuntu:/var/log/mysql# cat /proc/19018/stat 19018 (mysqld) S 1 19018 19018 0 -1…sent 8.77G 11 55.41M 5.15k 3.88k 258.55k 1.46k # Merge passes …21 1.57M 0 1 0.94 0.99 0.24 0.99 # Rows examine 4 1.57M 0 1… of hardware provides better balance of CPU vs IO utilization as well as as …
Comment: Quick comparison of MyISAM, Infobright, and MonetDB
Why you don’t put the version used of each software? that’s is very important!! there are differences between infobright 3.1.1 and 3.2 (ICE vs IEE), MySQL 4.1 vs 5.0 vs 5.1, for example.
Post: More Gotchas with MySQL 5.0
Working on large upgrade of MySQL 4.1 running Innodb to MySQL 5.0 and doing oprofile analyzes we found very interesting issue … of seconds being considered fast operation, as it is in MySQL 4.1 But why buf_get_latched_pages_number ? Because this function… being much higher for MySQL 5.0 compared to MySQL 4.1 It was something like 2-3 for MySQL 4.1 vs 40-60 for MySQL 5.0 At the…

