June 19, 2013

Post: MySQL and the SSB - Part 2 - MyISAM vs InnoDB low concurrency

…on the Star Schema Benchmark. In my previous blog post I compared MySQL 5.5.30 to MySQL 5.6.10, both…than InnoDB both cold and hot. SSB Flight #4 There is one query in this flight, Q4….recommended to prevent assorted security risks symbolic-links=0 innodb_stats_persistent innodb_stats_auto_update=off …

Post: MySQL 5.6 - InnoDB Memcached Plugin as a caching layer

benchmark, I ran some batches of fetch and store against both a standard memcached instance and a minimally tuned MySQL 54 Single core VM 528M RAM Host-Only network 1 Box with http/php, 1 box with memcache or mysql…, $memcacheOpts); $timer->start(); for ($i = 0; $i < 100000; $i++) { $cache->save(new …

Post: Percona XtraDB Cluster 5.5.30-23.7.4 for MySQL now available

… variable. Accepted values are in the range [0, 255] (inclusive). Quorum is computed using weighted …download from our repositories. Benchmark showing the impact of memory allocators on MySQL performance can be found …on Codership wsrep API 5.5.30-23.7.4, Percona XtraDB Cluster 5.5.30-23.7.4 is now …

Post: Benchmarking Percona Server TokuDB vs InnoDB

… ). Also please note the transaction produces 4 INSERTs and workload is very …that is why I also show 5-minute moving averages to TokuDB…. if you want to repeat this benchmark, the sysbench code is on …mysql_table_engine=tokudb –oltp_auto_inc=on –max-time=18000 –report-interval=10 –max-requests=0

Post: Virident vCache vs. FlashCache: Part 2

… cache storage device. EXT4 is the filesystem, and CentOS 6.4 the operating system, although the pre-release modules I received… of the benchmarks on both systems. The benchmark tool used was sysbench 0.5 and the version of MySQL used was Percona Server 5.5.30-rel30… think vCache can be declared the clear winner. Base MySQL & Benchmark Configuration All benchmarks were conducted with the following: sysbench ­­–num­-threads=32…

Post: Death match! EBS versus SSD price, performance, and QoS

… it out. I could do benchmarks, but that would not be interesting — we already know that benchmarks are unrealistic, and we know….4 90.8 0.0 0.0 4.0 25% 0 3.0 sdj1 0.6 0.2 12.3 0.3 0.1 4.8 9% 0 4.0 sdj1 0.2 0.1 8.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 2% 0 5.0 sdj1 0.7 4

Post: Join Optimizations in MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5

benchmark runs and that the disks are 4 5.4K disks in Software RAID5. Also note that the following changes were made on MySQL 5… the lowest query time is for MySQL 5.6 which takes 0.16s less as compared to MySQL 5.5 While with join_buffer_size set… for MySQL 5.6 becomes approximately equal to that of MySQL 5.5. MariaDB 5.5 is quite slow as compared to both MySQL 5.5 and MySQL 5.6. For MariaDB 5.5

Post: MySQL 6.0 vs 5.1 in TPC-H queries

… I played with queries from TPC-H benchmarks, particularly comparing MySQL 6.0.4-alpha with 5.1. MySQL 6.0 is interesting here, as there is… to write about is queries that execute slower in new MySQL 6.0 version. Query is pretty simple SELECT sum(l_extendedprice… to find is Baron’s bug with no mention in MySQL 6.0 manual. No mentions about Using MRR also, but I…

Post: Modeling MySQL Capacity by Measuring Resource Consumptions

… (or benchmarked) system performance to provide our estimates. If we’re running Innodb with MySQL we …5.15k 3.88k 258.55k 1.46k # Merge passes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 # Tmp tables 21.36k 0 2 0.01 0 0.11 00 1 0.94 0.99 0.24 0.99 # Rows examine 4 1.57M 0 1 0.94 0.99 0.24 0.99 # Rows affecte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Post: Multi Range Read (MRR) in MySQL 5.6 and MariaDB 5.5

MySQL 5.6, increase of 0.02s. But the query times for MariaDB 5.5 are greater than both MySQL 5.5 and MySQL 5benchmark on IO bound workload, mentioned above. Counter Name MySQL 5.5 MySQL 5.6 MySQL 5.6 w/ read_rnd_bufer_size=4M MariaDB 5.5 MariaDB 5.5