Percona's MySQL & InnoDB performance and scalability blog
This is part 2 in a 3 part series. In part 1, we took a quick look at some initial configuration of InnoDB full-text search and discovered a little bit of quirky behavior; here, we are going to run some queries and compare the result sets. Our hope is that the one of two things [...]
Inspiration for this post is courtesy of a friend and former colleague of mine, Greg Youngblood, who pinged me last week with an interesting MySQL puzzle. He was running Percona Server 5.5.21 with a table structure that looks something like this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | CREATE TABLE foo ( id INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY, uid INT UNSIGNED NOT NULL, update_time DATETIME NOT NULL, .... INDEX `uid` (uid, update_time), INDEX `bar` (some_other_columns) .... ) ENGINE=InnoDB; |
When he ran this query:
1 | SELECT MIN(update_time) FROM foo WHERE update_time IS NOT NULL AND update_time <> '0000-00-00 00:00:00'; |
The result came back as 2012-06-22 10:28:16. [...]
Often times, from a computing perspective, one must run a function on a large amount of input. Often times, the same function must be run on many pieces of input, and this is a very expensive process unless the work can be done in parallel. Shard-Query introduces set based processing, which on the surface appears [...]
All to often people force themselves into using a database like MySQL with no thought into whether if its the best solution to there problem. Why? Because their other applications use it, so why not the new application? Over the past couple of months I have been doing a ton of work for clients who [...]
Ever wondered how fast stored routines are in MySQL? I just ran a quick micro-benchmark to compare the speed of a stored function against a “roughly equivalent” subquery. The idea — and there may be shortcomings that are poisoning the results here, your comments welcome — is to see how fast the SQL procedure code [...]
Now as new MySQL Storage engine – Falcon is public I can write down my thought about its design, which I previously should have kept private as I partially got them while working for MySQL. These thought base on my understanding, reading docs, speaking to Jim, Monty, Arjen and other people so I might miss [...]
Have you ever seen index which refused to be used even if there is every reason for it to work (from the glance view):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | mysql> explain select * from article where article_id=10; +----+-------------+---------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+---------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | article | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 93490 | Using where | +----+-------------+---------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) |
Why on the earth index would not be used you would think, even if MySQL is mentioning it in “possible keys” ? Should you try to force it ?
MyISAM storage engine has key compression which makes its indexes much smaller, allowing better fit in caches and so improving performance dramatically. Actually packed indexes not a bit longer rows is frequent reason of MyISAM performing better than Innodb. In this article I’ll get in a bit more details about packed keys and performance implications [...]
Copyright © Percona LLC • Contact Us • MySQL and InnoDB are trademarks of Oracle Corp.