More simplistic Memcache vs. Memcache observations: http://blog.ulf-wendel.de/2013/toying-with-peclmysqlnd_memcache-and-mysql-5-6-memcache-innodb/ HandlerSocket vs Memcache is hard to compare as one would compare apples…
Comment: MySQL 5.6 - InnoDB Memcached Plugin as a caching layer
March 29, 2013 By 10 Comments
… comparison between performance of 5.6 memcached innodb write/read vs 5.6 innodb write/read with no memcached layer? Currently…
Post: MySQL 5.6 - InnoDB Memcached Plugin as a caching layer
March 29, 2013 By 10 Comments
… rough code for this benchmark: // Identical config/code for memcached vs InnoDB $frontendOpts = array( ‘caching’ => true, ‘lifetime’ => 3600, ‘automatic_serialization’ => true…
Comment: SimCity outages, traffic control and Thread Pool for MySQL
March 21, 2013 By 16 Comments
… almost to zero. We will run benchmarks with Thread Pool vs no-Thread Pool so we will see exact curve there…
Post: Testing the Virident FlashMAX II
March 21, 2013 By 1 Comment
… II: we see a read throughput of approximately 2580MiB/sec vs. 1450MiB/sec with the previous generation of hardware, an improvement…
Post: Analyzing air traffic performance with InfoBright and MonetDB
October 2, 2009 By 50 Comments
….3s and InfoBright: 0.31s To group all results there is graph: Conclusions: This experiment was not really about InfoBright vs MonetDB comparison. My goal was to check how available OpenSource software is able to handle such kind of tasks. Despite InfoBright…
Post: Quick comparison of MyISAM, Infobright, and MonetDB
September 29, 2009 By 30 Comments
… with SQL statements. I wanted to see how fast MyISAM vs. MonetDB would interpret really large INSERT statements, the kind produced… the next three together. Notes on Infobright A few miscellaneous notes: don’t forget that Infobright is not just a storage engine… a thing. LOAD DATA INFILE in Infobright isn’t what it seems to be. Otherwise, Infobright behaved about as I expected it…
Post: MySQL 5.6 vs MySQL 5.5 and the Star Schema Benchmark
March 11, 2013 By 7 Comments
… id=”attachment_13599″ align=”alignright” width=”210″] MySQL 5.6 vs MySQL 5.5 & the Star Schema Benchmark[/caption] So far… cache Star Schema Benchmark – Scale Factor 1 – Mysql 5.5 vs 5.6 response times are in seconds (lower is better…
Post: ext4 vs xfs on SSD
March 15, 2012 By 26 Comments
… see running MySQL benchmarks (to be published later) on ext4 vs xfs. Actually amount of threads does not affect the result…
Post: Shard-Query turbo charges Infobright community edition (ICE)
May 6, 2011 By 23 Comments
… MySQL storage engines. This set of benchmarks evaluates how well Infobright community edition (ICE) performs in combination with Shard-Query. Data… in cooperation with Infobright, including on benchmarking. These particular tests were performed independently of Infobright, without their knowledge or approval. Infobright was, however…
