Recently, I found myself involved in the migration of a large read-only InnoDB database to MyISAM (eventually packed). The only issue was that for one of the table, we were talking of 5 TB of data, 23B rows. Not small… I calculated that with something like insert into MyISAM_table… select * from Innodb_table… would take [...]
Connecting orphaned .ibd files
There are two ways InnoDB can organize tablespaces. First is when all data, indexes and system buffers are stored in a single tablespace. This is typicaly one or several ibdata files. A well known innodb_file_per_table option brings the second one. Tables and system areas are split into different files. Usually system tablespace is located in [...]
Analyzing air traffic performance with InfoBright and MonetDB
Accidentally me and Baron played with InfoBright (see http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2009/09/29/quick-comparison-of-myisam-infobright-and-monetdb/) this week. And following Baron’s example I also run the same load against MonetDB. Reading comments to Baron’s post I tied to load the same data to LucidDB, but I was not successful in this. I tried to analyze a bigger dataset and I took public [...]
Statistics of InnoDB tables and indexes available in xtrabackup
If you ever wondered how big is that or another index in InnoDB … you had to calculate it yourself by multiplying size of row (which I should add is harder in the case of a VARCHAR – since you need to estimate average length) on count of records. And it still would be quite [...]
To SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS or not to SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS?
When we optimize clients’ SQL queries I pretty often see a queries with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS option used. Many people think, that it is faster to use this option than run two separate queries: one – to get a result set, another – to count total number of rows. In this post I’ll try to check, is [...]
Why Index could refuse to work ?
Have you ever seen index which refused to be used even if there is every reason for it to work (from the glance view):
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | mysql> explain select * from article where article_id=10; +----+-------------+---------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+---------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | article | ALL | PRIMARY | NULL | NULL | NULL | 93490 | Using where | +----+-------------+---------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+-------+-------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec) |
Why on the earth index would not be used you would think, even if MySQL is mentioning it in “possible keys” ? Should you try to force it ?
Indexes in MySQL
MySQL does not always make a right decision about indexes usage. Condsider a simple table:
1 2 3 4 5 6 | CREATE TABLE `t2` ( `ID` int(11) default NULL, `ID1` int(11) default NULL, `SUBNAME` varchar(32) default NULL, KEY `ID1` (`ID1`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 |
1 | SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t2 |
; 250001 (V1)
1 | SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t2 WHERE ID1=1 |
; 83036 (V2) (execution time = 110 ms) That is index selectivity by condition (ID1=1) is V2/V1 = 0.3321 or 33.21% It is said (e.g. book “SQL Tuning”) if selectivity over 20% then a full table [...]

